Peter Crenshaw MBTI Personality Type
Personality
What personality type is Peter Crenshaw? Peter Crenshaw is an ESFP personality type in MBTI, 6w7 - sx/so - 629 in Enneagram, in Big 5, in Socionics.
I am sorry, but if Peter is an INFP than I am Jesus. I am really very irritated. He definitely isn‘t an INFP. I enjoyed the books and the CDs when I was a kid and remember he had zero Ne literally. He was never someone who saw many possibilities or was very future focused. He wasn‘t dreamy, dizzy or absent minded like Ne users often are, but very in the moment. Furthermore he wasn‘t an abstract thinker and more practical and concrete. He used very straightforward and direct language and never spoke in allegories or metaphors like Ne users often do. Instead he was always well grounded and focused on the present, something Ne users struggle with. He wasn‘t interested in the theoretical or abstract ideas at all. Nor in literature or poetry. I remember him accidentally being accepted in a poetry course in the university of Ruxton in case number 175, while he actually wanted to visit the sports course. He really struggled with it and had troubles expressing himself through words. Instead he expressed himself physically, releasing his anger and nervousness in sports and other physical activities. He is the one in the group, who executes risky actions and is more the body, while Justus is the brain. He is always quick to react to what happens around him and quite observant and in the moment. This can make him quite impulsive and quick to react at times. He often doesn‘t think of the consequences of his actions and jumps into action, but is good at fastest adapting to a new situation. He is someone who sees the practical aspects of things and often takes them at surface value, and because of this fails to estimate the consequences of his actions at times (Inferior Ni). Under stress he reacts overly controlling at times, worrying about everything and having weird hunches about things. He expresses this nervousness physically and through taking action, which is likely a result of his strong Se. Furthermore he is very leisure and comfort seeking, likes good food, thrill and sports. He isn‘t someone who gets lost in his thoughts that much and life’s in the moment. While definitely NOT An INFP, he definitely has stronger Fi than Fe. He is more in tune with his own emotions than with that of those around him. He isn‘t someone who has problems with conflicts at all an can be incredibly hot headed and stubborn about his views and values. He life’s by his own emotions and values and what is important to him and doesn‘t let himself to be influenced by others that much. Furthermore he is very sensitive, but often hides this side of him appearing more cool on the outside. Still around his friends he can be quite temperamental and easily angered at times, which likely is a result of his tertiary Te. He definitely is an xSFP and I personally lean more towards ESFP for now. The INFP votes are obnoxious. And please don‘t come with are Fi/Si loop or something like that. This is not how it works. Even if in a loop INFPs will still have strong Ne, Even though it might be not always visible. It just means that the tertiary function is stronger than usual and unhealthily interacting with the dominant function. Still Ne would be visible especially in a character like Peter, who we get to see much of in both books and CDs. He also isn‘t that unhealthy that on would think he is looping. There are basically no reasons to type him as INFP and while some people may would complain that this is intuitive bias I don‘t think that. I just think that many people, who at least belief themselves to be INFPs can relate to Peter. But he is written in a way to be relatable. It’s like when people here say they relate to Zuko. Zuko was specifically written to be a relatable character for the audience of all types. The problem is also that many INFPs, INFJs, INTJs and other intuitives you find on the internet are often mistyped themselves. It is just highly unrealistic that here on this site there are so many and other where there are so few. And no this is not because intuitives are naturally more interested in Mbti like some like to say. It is just because most people simply use free online tests to determine their type, which are extremely superficial and tendency quit biased towards intuitives. When you look at the statistics at 16 personalities for example you see that basically all over the world the majority of people who have taken the test got results like INFJ, INFP and INTP or ENTJ, which are actually among the more rare types. So please don‘t type a character as INFP, because you relate. Apart from this you can basically relate to anyone. For example I can relate to Mary Crawley from Downton Abbey and am far from being an ENTJ. For those who already voted INFP I really ask you to reconsider your choice since out pains me to see the votes. I am glad that it is so tight, even though I also don‘t think he is a Fe user. But please help to fix this mistype.
Biography
Related Personalities
Bob Andrews
Jupiter Jones
Mathilda Jones
Jelena Charkova
Victor Hugenay
Clarissa Franklin
Titus Jones
Inspector Cotta
