Xerxes Break نوع شخصية MBTI
شخصية
"ما نوع الشخصية Xerxes Break؟ Xerxes Break هو نوع ENTP في mbti ، 7w8 - sp/sx - 793 في enneagram ، RCUEI في Big 5 ، ILE في Socionics."
I don't think the consensus is gonna change because not many people look at this page anymore (sadly Pandora Hearts doesn't have the recognition it deserves) but it has come to my attention that Break is currently typed as VLEF (Socrates) in Psychosophy and other people here are suggesting VLFE (Lenin) and I wonder why? My complaint lies with his volition's placement, the most important aspect out of the four functions in PY. (All the information provided below is a brief compilation of quotes from the Wiki Personality Database and Syntax of Love) >What is Volition? It's the manifestation of self-conception and all matters related to the pure essence of our spirit, such as: willpower, desires, self-worth, strength of character, decision-making and perception of stances in social hierarchy. It is identified most with internal identity and is the main sphere with which a person makes their decisions, how they make their decisions, and under what circumstances to make certain decisions, who take advice from. >First Will (Tsar) The first function is characterized by absolute surety and an excessive reliance on this way of seeing the world, making it the most strongly held trait; it is a gift we give to ourselves in overabundance. In the case of the First Will (Tsar), they are inherently leaders, overly confident and boastful with their ability to rule over people and change the world according to their desires. The 1V believes there are two steps to a hierarchy, and they are simply the superior ones. They treat everyone equally— that is, equally inferior to them. Ever since childhood they have felt that they have a right to more than others. Taking their extreme individuality into consideration, if 1V allow someone else's power over their own, this causes a loss in their "I". Rebelliousness has an intrinsic value to them, it's very difficult to manage such people. 1V are the masters of their own destiny, such people have no contradiction between word and deed, between desire and realisation. >Debunking 1V I fail to see many of this characteristics in Break since his character is one that is as antithetical to 1V as it gets - a man with “two personalities” who tries to hide from everyone his turmoil past as the infamous murderer, Kevin Reignard, and adopted this new identity as an attempt to find some redemption for his sins, encouraged by his unreconciled pain, guilt and loss, when the central concept of first Volition is pure, monolithic selfdom, a person out of touch with feelings of shame and internal tragedy. Futhermore, Break almost never leads by asserting himself overly and confidently in order to make others believe in his strong personality to dominate any situation; and instead he uses more indirect methods to go after what he wants, always working behind the scenes with supreme cautiousness. In addition, the simplistic view of hierarchy and indestructible autonomy of the First Will doesn't really line up with Break's character when both in his past as Kevin and in his new life as Xerxes Break he has been devoted to an authority he works for. This really contradicts the dictatorship of their “I” inherent to the First Will, who doesn't obey the rules of anyone but themselves. His low volition is clearly shown throughout the story and I don't know how you missed it. Kevin lost his will to live due to the consequences of his actions and he needed a reason to keep moving forward. The fact that Break relies on other people's wishes for self-motivation (the external reassurance of Shelly Rainsworth and the promise he made to the Intention) is inconceivable to 1V in its fullest. Why would a Tsar, in its instinctive predisposition towards sovereignty and greatness, ever share such an experience? They are purposeful adults who don't back down from anything; and Break was willing to give up on achieving his goals a couple of times out of his inner insecurities and weaknesses. In my opinion, the most sensible options for psychotypes are FLVE (Aristippus) or FLEV (Epicurus). I'm still on the fence between the two but for now I'm leaning towards 3V, although he seems to have the melancholic worldview of 3E. If this quote said by Oz in referencing to Break doesn't scream some form of 3V, I don't know what to tell you: “Perhaps Break is a lot weaker than I always thought he was. However, I’m sure that he’s a whole lot stronger than he thinks he is.”
