Pomni نوع شخصية MBTI
شخصية
"ما نوع الشخصية Pomni؟ Pomni هو نوع INFP في mbti ، 6w5 - sp/so - 649 في enneagram ، RLOAN في Big 5 ، EII في Socionics."
— 𝐏𝐎𝐌𝐍𝐈: 𝐈𝐅(𝐍) 𝐄𝐈𝐈 (1/3) Vote is susceptible to change with future episodes. 𝐈. 𝐃𝐄𝐁𝐔𝐍𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐒𝐈 While reading arguments for Si-base, I sense that there is a misconception when it comes to what Introverted Sensing is. Many argue that Pomni is Si due to her cautious/on-alert approach to the Digital Circus, but there’s more to this function than seeking routine. This function doesn’t solely rely on environmental stability, but emotional stability as well. Si-base is described as one who’s easygoing, adaptable and non-contemplative due to the strive to be continuously harmonic with their body/mind. The need for comfort is their top priority, causing Si-base to internalize sensations so they can recreate the scene at a later time. Due to Si-base’s search for unity with the environment, they regularly keep their internal state in check—preventing the risk of catastrophizing the situation. ➤ “Naturalness and quiet ease, natural peacefulness and kindness allow Dumas to see the world friendly. Propensity subtly and consciously perceive their own feelings and the diversity of feelings, trust them, help to respond flexibly to changes in the external world, without losing the sense of self.” (Zamanskaya) I find this antithetical for Pomni, a very “in their head” character who exhibits prominent neuroticism. Why would a character who “always comes back looking traumatized” be categorized in the type that strives for emotional equilibrium? I cannot see someone who’s Si-base being as reactive as Pomni, a character who’s twitchy, emotionally reactive, and easily prone to spiraling, since the main motto for this function is to obtain homeostasis. Mobilizing Si (Incapable of using it without the help/guidance of others) is more suitable for Pomni. There is a want for comfortability but, on her own, she is unable to produce it. It doesn’t take much to get Pomni to spiral—she needs someone accompanying her in order to stay rational. ➤ “The individual has difficulty producing pleasurable sensory experiences for others and for himself, but likes to talk about pleasure, enjoyment, and relaxation, hoping that someone nearby will take the hint and take the lead. […] He needs someone to help him relax and take an internal look at whether he actually needs or enjoys what he is doing, and what might be the source of the tension that has built up. He can tend to extremes in this area, either depriving or indulging the senses to an unhealthy extent.” (Wikisocion) We see this in episode three, Kinger having to be that ‘someone’ Pomni relies on to maintain stability. Without his reassurance, Pomni was quick to grow agitated—struggling to control her emotions when she was by her lonesome. On the contrary, when she’s with Kinger, Pomni was able to express herself in a way that didn’t have her hyperventilating. ➝ Pomni: “We… are literally in Hell right now. Hell! Of course I’d been in Hell. How could I not be in literally Hell right now?” Kinger: “Just try to stay calm. I’m sure Caine included a way to escape.” (The Mystery Of Mildenhall Manor) I struggle to see this dependence in Si-base, the function that’s a part of the Ego-block—the most confident block that knows what is needed without outside assistance. For reference, to establish how bad I believe SLI is for her, Kinger being Si-base—with how he recreates pleasant sensory atmospheres to help him stay in internal homeostasis—makes more sense then the ongoing Pomni SLI arguments.
