Emma D'Arcy نوع شخصية MBTI
شخصية
"ما نوع الشخصية Emma D'Arcy؟ Emma D'Arcy هو نوع INTJ في mbti ، 5w4 - sp/sx - في enneagram ، في Big 5 ، SEE في Socionics."
So it looks like with Emma, their cognitive functions is agreed upon, the issue is the order of the stacking. ISFPs and INTJs can definitely be confused with one another so let's look at how the functions in their orders: "ExxP - Pe(Ji-Je)Pi. World is viewed through the lens of the Pe function. Thrives in the here-and-now; gathers perceptions. Pe proactively navigates objective perceptions, taking broad amounts of external information in real-time. Ji helps them categorize and make sense of what they are perceiving through internal alignment; this may help them narrow down which objects are worthwhile to work with (based on judgment—what is logically congruent (Ti) or what they personally value (Fi)). Je provides them a release valve through which they employ external judgements/standards to do something about their Pe and Ji in a relieving or playful way. Pi breaks their fun by restricting the breadth of novelty, but is required so they don’t get lost aimlessly wandering (or die)." I think it's very clearly they don't lead with a Pe function so ESFP isn't even an option for me. IxxP - Ji(Pe-Pi)Je. The world is viewed through the lens of the Ji function. Thrives in accordance with internal alignment. It doesn’t matter how the external effects are judged, as long as there is congruence with an internal principle. Auxiliary Pe contextualizes their judgments; it is where they explore, live out, and embody their personal principles, “making an art of it”. Tertiary Pi allows them to organize the information they gather; it helps them perceive something more “eternal”, the enduring fruits of their Pe explorations used in a relieving or playful way. Tertiary Pi can look childishly stubborn and defeatist since it cuts down on Pe’s breadth, but it can also be a source of escapism based around the principles or values of the dominant Ji function. Inferior Je is a point of conflict since it’s impossible to act out of alignment with Ji, leading to difficulties implementing common sense or standards, which can make them come off as impractical or as if they are “making things harder for themself” when there’s a commonly accepted streamlined way to do something. It must be in line with their personal principles. "IxxJ - Pi(Je-Ji)Pe. World is viewed through the lens of the Pi function. Thrives when they know what will happen; Pi reactively synthesizes subjective internal “maps” that they go forth to the world with. Je is their way of making it into the external world (and to consciously conceive of it in the first place in the case of Ni doms), and it is used to support their Pi. It is used both to have an impact on the external world by employing common sense (to what that is applied depends on Te or Fe), and help them indirectly “translate” their perception into terms of external parameters and judgemental standards (though the subjective experiential element gets lost in translation through rationalizing it). Ji allows them to make their perception internally coherent by identifying what they make of it in a relieving or playful way, giving their vision meaning for themself (which they may act upon or articulate with Je). Pe can be an overwhelming minefield of unpredictability and unreliability, but is required so they have experiences to create reactive mental maps from in the first place. Note that Pi is the most externally “invisible” function, so the first thing you’re going to externally see from these types is their Je. However, their demeanor is different from that of the ExxJ when they use it, because for the IxxJ it is ultimately contingent on their accumulated/prevailing Pi perceptions, not the judgment system in of itself. They will be more lax about their judgements, both because Ji is much more easily reconciled with Je, and because it's the perception that is ultimately important, not so much their opinion or justifications or reasons." Comparing how IxxP and IxxJ functions, it's very clear to me that Emma's leading function is Pi vs Ji. We can see their NiSe functions quite clear in interviews where they break down scenes, they seem to have a very holistic, birds eye view, naturally seeing all fronts and often describing the characters motivations or reasoning behind their actions as oppose to Fi dom, who'll either look at the characters through empathy or through their judgement. Both Fi and Ni are very similar in terms of their level on introversion and not being able to spot but one thing that jumps out more to me is their use of Te over Se. Emma has a good understanding of objective systems and is able to look at characters and hold them to an "objective standard." In particular, with the scene in driftmark, they always make comments about how mad rhaenyra was making them as Rhaenyra was simply lying. They have a deep level of empathy towards Alicent as on an objective front, Aemond was maimed and Rhaenyra and Viserys took attention away from what's the obvious bigger issue.
سيرة شخصية
Emma Zia D'Arcy (born 27 June 1992) is an English film, television, and theatre actor who has appeared in television productions such as Truth Seekers, Wanderlust and House of the Dragon.
شخصية correlate
Emma Watson
Cillian Murphy
Tom Holland
Robert Pattinson
Anya Taylor-Joy
Andrew Garfield
Tom Hiddleston
Benedict Cumberbatch
