People & Characters
Music
Vocal Synthesiser Songs
hya - WATCHER MBTI Personality Type

hya - WATCHER MBTI Personality Type

hya - WATCHER Personality Type

Personality
Biography
Related Personalities

Personality

What personality type is hya - WATCHER? hya - WATCHER is an personality type in MBTI, 2w3 - - 287 in Enneagram, in Big 5, in Socionics.

(1/6) I’ve been meaning to post an analysis for this song since I created the profile, so now, I’ll be justifying my votes with Jung’s Psychological Types and Naranjo’s works (27 Personalities in Search of Being, Character and Neurosis, his individual enneatype books...). To begin with, I think the singer is Se-Fe, based on their primary modality of interacting with the world, as well as the nature of their judgments (when they do make them). Looking at the lyrics, this stalker is extremely present in the moment and focused on sensory stimuli:  The nape of your hair flicks a little to the right today. your neck is so pale and slender—makes me wanna bite. Your shoulders are stiff, tight, like you're being chased, your hardworking vibe is just too good—so cool. [...] Hey, hey, hey, I'm standing right behind you. I'm here, I'm here, I'm here, I'm here. English Pear & Freesia,[1] I'm right behind you now, the scent is drifting, drifting. I'll give your back a push— yoo-hoo. One might usually associate a yandere-like character with Feeling-dominance—and to be clear, I do think this is a Jungian Feeler, not a Thinker (that is, their conscious judging function is F rather than T)—but the singer is almost entirely focused on absorbing their environment. They don’t default to making ethical judgments, they don’t lead with categorizations of people or things as “good,” “bad,” “sensical,” “nonsensical.” Their first priority is observation of their immediate surroundings and enjoyment of physical presence—“I’m here, I’m here, I’m here, I’m here.” This is an almost exact match for Jung’s extroverted sensation type:   “On the lower levels, this type is the lover of tangible reality, with little inclination for reflection and no desire to dominate. To feel the object, to have sensations and if possible enjoy them—that is his constant aim. He is by no means unlovable; on the contrary, his lively capacity for enjoyment makes him very good company; he is usually a jolly fellow, and sometimes a refined aesthete. In the former case the great problems of life hang on a good or indifferent dinner; in the latter, it’s all a question of good taste. […] The intensification does not necessarily have to be pleasurable, for this type need not be a common voluptuary; he is merely desirous of the strongest sensations, and these, by his very nature, he can receive only from outside. […] He dresses well, as befits the occasion; he keeps a good table with plenty of drink for his friends, making them feel very grand, or at least giving them to understand that his refined taste entitles him to make a few demands of them. He may even convince them that certain sacrifices are decidedly worth while for the sake of style. The more sensation predominates, however, so that the subject disappears behind the sensation, the less agreeable does this type become. He develops into a crude pleasure-seeker, or else degenerates into an unscrupulous, effete aesthete.” In contrast, this is Jung’s extroverted feeling type:   “I may feel moved, for instance, to say that something is “beautiful” or “good,” not because I find it “beautiful” or “good” from my own subjective feeling about it, but because it is fitting and politic to call it so, since a contrary judgment would upset the general feeling situation. A feeling judgment of this kind is not by any means a pretence or a lie, it is simply an act of adjustment. A painting, for instance, is called “beautiful” because a painting hung in a drawing room and bearing a well-known signature is generally assumed to be beautiful, or because to call it “hideous” would presumably offend the family of its fortunate possessor, or because the visitor wants to create a pleasant feeling atmosphere, for which purpose everything must be felt as agreeable. […] When extraverted feeling predominates we speak of an extraverted feeling type. Examples of this type that I can call to mind are, almost without exception, women. The woman of this type follows her feeling as a guide throughout life. As a result of upbringing her feeling has developed into an adjusted function subject to conscious control. […] This is seen nowhere more clearly than in her love choice: the “suitable” man is loved, and no one else; he is suitable not because he appeals to her hidden subjective nature—about which she usually knows nothing—but because he comes up to all reasonable expectations in the matter of age, position, income, size and respectability of his family, etc. One could easily reject such a picture as ironical or cynical, but I am fully convinced that the love feeling of this type of woman is in perfect accord with her choice. It is genuine and not just shrewd. There are countless “reasonable” marriages of this kind and they are by no means the worst. These women are good companions and excellent mothers so long as the husbands and children are blessed with the conventional psychic constitution.”