Seki Masumi type de personnalité MBTI
Personnalité
"Quel type de personnalité est Seki Masumi? Seki Masumi est un type de personnalité ISTP dans MBTI, 5w6 - sp/sx - 594 dans Enneagram, RLUEN dans Big 5, SLI dans Socionics."
quotes I typed (straight from the translated manga) that to me portray his dom function well (for doubters) + after-thought type from me added on, skim the thoughts if you want - “Humans are free. Although we can’t fly through the skies all alone. If we can think it, we can do almost anything. we can sleep when we’re sleepy. we are free to start or stop anything whenever we wish, of course it is a bit hindered by common sense, moralities, and rules of society. walking nude out in the streets, stealing from the elderly, and even killing, we can all do this as long as we throw away our morals. which is why they drill these laws in our head when we are children, and yet people still continue to fight, deceive, and still from each-other, and so people suffer because they live. even now there are events of happiness and unhappiness going on all over the world…What can we do to make everyone happy? of course that’s impossible for me to know. If the answer of that could be found in the shallow wisdoms of a kid, wars would have stopped long ago. but I also dislike leaving that problem up to society or the government. after all, a great person is just one who follows the popular will of the people. In this world the essence of a frank honest human is just an idealization. I’m sure that there’s nothing that can make everyone happy. happiness is relative, and that’s how people want it. evil is also relative. mothers can become demons when they do anything to protect their child, yet it is usually seen as admirable, but when a person does anything for a country he loves, wars break out. Isn’t it all the same thing? no matter how much a person pretends to be good and kind, he will still have negative aspects, but nobody really tries to notice that fact. why is that? they all try to place the blame on others, and never even consider the possibility that they themselves may have played part in the problem. Just what the hell am I thinking? the world isn’t going to change no matter what I think. I don’t really want to do anything. I don’t want to order nor trouble anyone. that’s just laziness I guess. I don’t go to school nor do I work and I’ve been wasting my time away since noon.” - ch 52 vol 5. “I was asked to kill a man, at a family restaurant by a pretty lady. I didn’t really feel anything towards it. she wanted to kill even though she was only ridiculed. I wonder if the cases you hear on tv were like this too, just happening all of a sudden. maybe there’s no real rhyme nor reason. It just happens. In other words that’s just how fate is, I feel that the me of now can do anything. I know, he’s probably just your average citizen, so I don’t think of him as an evil person. him, that lady, even me. we’re all the same past our skin deep differences. Is there such a thing as a righteous person in this world? I’m sure that even such a person would have their flaws.” - ch 53 vol 5. IT(S) ISTP-% introvertedT (subjective>objective) cognitive process questioning logic for their own internal framework, paired with lower fe-knowing. extrovertedF objective > subjective takes external standards and analyzes them/dismisses them thus leads T>F though still respects customs somewhat, fairly grounded and doesn’t prefer N over S glad to see almost everyone agree on a consensus. - I’ll probably add on more after studying still debating with SvsN but leaning towards S because of how grounded he tends to be, it may just be ti-pull that gets him lost in thought so S>N.
