Dildo tipe kepribadian MBTI
Kepribadian
"Jenis kepribadian apa itu Dildo? Dildo adalah tipe kepribadian INTJ di mbti, 7w8 - sx/sp - 514 di enneagram, RLUAI dalam Big 5, SEE dalam socionics."
INTJ because: It can foresee a future where you climax with it (Ni). It seems to understand that it’s ultimate purpose/goal within the next 1-2 years (or more if you’re freaky) is to pleasure you so greatly you have absolutely no choice but to go back in (literally) for seconds until it’s own lifespan has slowly depleted (Ni-Te combo). It will make SURE you are satisfied and will not rest until every conceivable route to Poundtown is executed (strong Te; very strong). This is such Ni-Te, do I even need to go over it’s Fi and Se?? You could make the argument that because I said, “it will make SURE *you* are satisfied,” that it is actually using Fe, but I implore you to think again before coming to such painful conclusions lmao. This is not an INFJ. Te is too powerful. So how tf does this represent Fi? You see, this slimy inanimate object, which contradicts the logistics of Toy Story’s narrative framework, actually has its own internal values in the sense that it isn’t pleasuring you because it wants YOU to feel good. HA! No. It is doing so because it has its own set of rigid principles which simply must ensure that it’s user (in which case, you) needs to feel good because that is it’s intended purpose - it’s sole reason for existing. If not to make you feel good, it loses all sense of self. Its own identity disappears faster than you can swallow (Fi). So please use it. Be kind to it. Now for Se, it has a pleasant scent……is what I’d *like* to say but this thing is filthy. Clean the thing, you idiot. I know you don’t. You gotta do it because this thing’s inferior Se means it cannot clean itself. You COULD make the argument that, say for example, a chair does not clean itself and yet it does not have inferior Se- …wait. *checks notes* …huh. Actually it does. Okay, slight tangent, but a chair is indeed an INFJ with inferior Se. I was going to provide pushback in which some other inanimate objects do not have inferior Se and yet they do not also self clean, but since chairs also have inferior Se (which I believe to be the case), I guess my initial argument is sound. Except it isn’t because, other inanimate objects such as a tissue cannot clean itself and… *checks notes* …the tissue is an INFP. It does not have inferior Se. So then, how is it possible for a tissue to not “self-clean” and still be dirty (………..😏) after usage without inferior Se? Simple solution (and no, there aren’t any holes in my argument unlike the holes on your ***): INFP’s have inferior Te. This means the tissue, does not see self-cleanliness as a goal that needs to be met. It has no incentive to do so. So there you have it. This marvellously sticky object is a clear-cut INTJ. If you disagree, unfortunately I cannot help you. This is obviously the only correct answer and it’s Ni-Te “happy-feet-wombo-combo” is so shamelessly unequivocal, that I just cannot turn a blind eye. Have a good day. …so um, after reading this over, maybe it doesn’t contradict the logical framework behind Toy Story after all. Dill doughs have a mind of their own.
