Alexander Hartdegen tipo di personalità MBTI
Personalità
"Che tipo di personalità è Alexander Hartdegen? Alexander Hartdegen è un tipo di personalità INTJ in mbti, 5w6 - SO5 - 514 in enneagram, RLOAI in big 5, in socionics."
I'm just gonna come right out and say it, okay. Have you put your oxygen mask on? I disagree with the INTP typing. He's not an INTP, but I should explain why he's not, shouldn't I? It would be most appropriate for me to offer up some explanation. Well, I will do just that. Throughout my many journeys on PDB I have found it advisable that one should, so I shall. I set sail at dawn. You must wait 'til then, but not really, because I'm going to tell you now. I'm going to just open up. Let it out, the beast of verdict within. You've been warned. Roar. Why is Alexander Hartdegen not an INTP? For starters, his thinking is inductive, not deductive, which is why he goes to the future to get his answer. He doesn't have a good episodic memory, which XNXP types (and really any type on the Si-Ne perception axis) have, but Alexander's memory is more semantic, dealing with concepts. He's more of an engineer than a scientist. He goes to see VOX (the actual INTP in the film) to get the deduction. Alexander Hartdegen : "Can you tell me what's happening here?" Vox : "Well, my sources are no longer fully annotated and my information is somewhat anecdotal but, I believe what was once one race, is now two. One above. And one below. Two distinct species that have evolved." Alexander Hartdegen : "And how do those below survive?" Vox : "That is the real question, isn't it?" Alexander Hartdegen : "I don't believe it." Vox : "Well, if you don't like the answers, you should avoid asking the questions. Look at them. They have no knowledge of the past. No ambition for the future. So lucky." Alexander Hartdegen : "Why would you say something like that?" Vox : "Can you even imagine what it's like to remember everything? I remember the six year old girl who asked me about dinosaurs eight hundred thousand years ago. I remember the last book I recommended. "Look Homeward, Angel" by Thomas Wolfe. And yes, I even remember you. Time Travel... practical application." This dialogue examples how Alexander is on the Ni-Se perception axis. ✅ Notice when he asks "why would you say something like that" he's reacting to Vox saying "They have no knowledge of the past. No ambition for the future. So lucky," i.e. he's responding to the objective metrics/values/limitation (Fe) expressed by Vox. Alexander doesn't understand people-oriented thinking. ✅ Notice the whole film is about Alexander's journey to become less thing-oriented. He builds the time machine in the first place because he thinks of his life as a thing that he can control. He doesn't repress Fe, but it's his polr function. His mind is dominated by objective optics/symbols/vantage (Te). ✅ Notice during the scene in the future when he speaks with that girl jogger he's completely oblivious to mutual sociable manners. Part of that is being in awe of the future, but part of it is he simply sucks at reading faces. Über-Morlock : "Who are you to question 800,000 years... of evolution?" Alexander Hartdegen : "This is, this is a perversion of every natural law." This exchange examples Alexander's auxiliary objective optics/symbols/vantage (Te) and tertiary subjective metrics/values/limitation (Fi). ✅ Realize there is no "natural law" antithetical to nature. ✅ Notice that Alexander isn't employing subjective thinking in response to the Über-Morlock, but he's employing extraverted thinking. He's not responding with a deduction, but he's responding with an induction to answer with "this is a perversion of every natural law." ✅ Notice, obviously, if that were the case it wouldn't be happening in nature. Deduction says things that happen in nature are natural. Induction says what is natural is what is functional and to that effect what is moral. See the difference?? Alexander is logically moralistic, i.e. his logic is led by morality. If he were an INTP, it would be the other way around, his morals would be led by logic, but they are not. ✅ Notice Alexander's morals are subject (Fi), whereas his logic is object (Te). David Philby : "Nothing can change what happened." Alexander Hartdegen : "No, you're wrong. Because I will change it." ✅ Notice only a strong Ni type spits in the face of ordinal logic. Types with Si are emotionally compatible with ordinal logic, because it works well with their better episodic memory, but if your memory is more semantic you'll prefer cardinal logic. And if you're an INTJ you'll like to think maximally and utilize propositions. This is what Alexander does. He's not an INTP. Alexander Hartdegen is an INTJ.
