Rufus Sewell mbtiパーソナリティタイプ
個性
"Rufus Sewellはどのような性格タイプですか？ Rufus Sewellは、ENFJ in MBTI、2w3 - so/sp - 268 in Enneagram、SCOAI in Big 5、SLE in socionics のパーソナリティタイプです。"
WE FINALLY SOLVED A TWO YEAR-OLD EQUATION!! With the research I have done, along with the help of my two best friends, I did it! I have to say, fellows, that this is the most difficult typology I've ever come across BY A MILE!! This is my all-time favorite actor and so, I cherish this dearly... READ IN FULL: There are elements that are unavoidable, based on his work rhythms and general ideas of progress, his ambitions stemming from childhood (and as reported by many sources throughout the late-80s, and early-90s), his wishes on doing everything imaginable, always externally intense, his perspective on aesthetics which grows sharper overtime, what he avoids due to his former childhood, as well as what he values from his life physically (objects of exposition, like houses, cars, and appropriate vacations -- as seen from my detailed research on his life behind the scenes, in moderation) which stem from his individual work -- a firm indicative of E2, dominant at that. Mostly due to a show of personal pride as a sign of confirmation rather than image-related disguises. The good thing is that it's obvious that he doesn't wish that to be transparent to absolutely everyone, only in chunks which also explain his privacy, that he can then digest based on how he wants it to be percieved intimately -- he's honed in on how people should show themselves, but as a trait that helps him navigate his uninspected emotional nature (SO/SX 2w3). HIs tritype is an obvious combination of 2w3, 6w5 and 8w9. The 8 fix is absolutely clear in his "less-than-methodic" communication patterns, aka his bluntness and directness, indicative in his posh-averse mindset, even as he approaches it thanks to his dom E2. His 6 fix can be seen in how he rationalizes physical ideas to materialize safety and conciseness in his career, as well as his family -- as well as his aversion to the rigidity of his current system (reported as a rebel off to look for his own skin, even as a teen). As far as his Jungian typology is concerned, his dominant F.e is evident when prioritizing the valor of his populism and how people can evolve themselves without jumping at other people pretentiously (even at governing bodies), along with its practices and establishing what is needed for a community, him responding to different societal values (for example: customs and humor) based on everyone's responses (The Americans' lack of grasp of sarcasm), the rationalization of actions from others he seems to take notice of almost right the bat, without any prior justification -- as well as his imagery being linked to his joint usage of F.e and S.e (his S.e being developed as gradually as any tertiary function in one's teens -- to what it is nowadays, which is only an asset of relief, as implied by the man himself in countless interviews), in order to garner some physical will. I wouldn't say he is a high S.e user, because his life isn't characterized by "living in the moment", which if we were to look at younger Rufus with his strategems and notions of external confidence, fueled by both him and how he is projected by other people and how he continuously judges how people reciprocate one another collectively (Dom F.e), doesn't always see to rely on (even in his youth, according to statements of his own, he found pretty boring) but, it is all a base for developing his senses on a controlled level. His aux N.i is pretty evident from his 2nd nature-like displacement of self for his answers, the way he naturally draws himself into a linear-drawing subspace, with the fluid, almost continuous answers he formulates based on pattern recognition in a common logical human fashion (as we evidently see in how how through his F.e - N.i axis, he rationalizes John Smith's actions, by talking about the general phenomena of "normalizing" as a functional process, not as a blatantly human one, giving him the opportunity to generally strategize and focus order for his career). Not everyone with aux N.i, especially in his industry has proper insights about its trajectory but, thanks to his E3, His T.i is clearly inferior due to his detached demeanor in situations that might have brought him stress to a dividing degree -- stating in a Belfast edition interview for "The Telegraph", stating that niceness is a "weakness". He spoke about the purity of interactions that are valid, and that was him T.i extrapolating how F.e ought to be used (F.e - N.i). While looking at the his usage of T.i in his prime, when relating to his other functions, we notice that it's placed inferior but in growing development, seeing as he talks about himself in relation to his development for the better as an essence. As far as his temperament is concerned, there are no traces of Choleric traits in him, seeing as he isn't necessarily forceful but very gradual when applying himself in social settings, always boisterous yet collected (Sang). For specific references, click on the reply button:
バイオグラフィー
Rufus Frederik Sewell (born 29 October 1967) is an English actor. He has appeared in films such as Hamlet, The Woodlanders, Dangerous Beauty, Dark City, A Knight's Tale, The Illusionist, Tristan and Isolde, and Martha, Meet Frank, Daniel and Laurence.
個性 correlate
Emma Watson
Cillian Murphy
Tom Holland
Robert Pattinson
Anya Taylor-Joy
Andrew Garfield
Tom Hiddleston
Benedict Cumberbatch
