Amanda Seales mbtiパーソナリティタイプ
個性
"Amanda Sealesはどのような性格タイプですか？ Amanda Sealesは、ENTJ in MBTI、8w7 - so/sp - 836 in Enneagram、SLOEI in Big 5、 in socionics のパーソナリティタイプです。"
I am very convinced she is ENTJ based on what I've heard from her and I'm going to give examples. But let me get this out of the way, I've seen comments holding the misconception that Te = completely factual and considers all the facts. Te is an objective function, not one that operates on internally-based facts like Ti. That means Te will always defend the side its on as long as it *objectively* makes sense to them, based on the facts they have seen. It is why many Te leaders don't necessarily do what makes 'logical' sense but rather serves to benefit or help the side they are on. And based on her background, studying African American studies, she speaks from a standpoint of what she learned. I'll use the Jubilee debate as an example for why she is a clear ENTJ. Amanda's passion comes from more a place of Te than Fi, since she often tries to avoid inserting her personal feelings and morals when arguing (yes, they can come out during low points in arguments, but that is more an indication of inferior Fi than secondary Fi), you'll notice she deters from saying the word "I" unless she addresses specific work she has done. She often instead addresses the argument of the opponent or the opponent themselves. Through the debate, there were times she would stop to address the audience specifically. This was so she could set her perspective straight, which is reflective of Te in the way they want to assure everyone understands -- rather than Fi, which wouldn't necessarily care enough about how people perceive their morals to make a public announcement about it. It's also clear she *does* strive to make a grander-scale change, such as saying: "I come from a place to understand the experience of Black Americans, not undermine it" -- as to address a wider-group for a deep change. Amanda will also often say things mid-argument like "I'm going to need you to get to the point" -- so she could address it, rather than desiring to engage in rambling or additional unnecessary commentary. Te has a reputation of being blunt, especially in their efforts to "cut to the chase" -- therefore can often come across cold or direct. This is a very common quality of Te that Amanda displays. In terms of Amanda's Ni, the function itself is very subtle (particularly as a secondary function, since it exists to serve the dominant function, which in her case is Te) and it comes out frequently. She aims to instil a 'bigger picture mindset' in her arguments. She will often criticize the bipartisan system of liberals and conservatives, taking a more 'radical' ideology of rising above them in order to progress as a society. For example, oftentimes when her opposition would bring up personalized arguments, such as personal anecdotes and experience, she would resort in bringing them back into the ideological concept of how the 'system' created those situations for them, rather than honing in on their specific experiences. Considering Ni is a recognition function and her focus on a 'bigger' picture tells me her Ni is in high support of her Te. Her Se is present in her quick reactions and grand expressions when others are talking, she is also quick to jump in and spontaneously bring a related point in what they say (Ni-Se). It's prominent but not her dominant, as she doesn't react suddenly to something out of the blue, but rather in response to someone's idea. She's also very comfortable being in the moment, being surrounded by different people, and adapting to different situations. This is common for ENTJ's when they feel confident about they knowledge they have -- being comfortable in their Te allows them to quickly use other functions like Se. When Amanda becomes fed-up with the argument of her opponent, this is when her Fi is revealed. With inferior functions, they show themselves in either stress or brilliance. When someone calls her mixed, for example, she proudly snaps back to clarify that both of her parents are black, which is part of her identity and ultimately serves the point she's making in her argument (Te dom, Fi inferior). It's also been something she's had to correct in many arguments. But overall, she tends to avoid bringing it unless someone specifically mentions it. Another factor we have to consider here is that Amanda is an enneagram 8. This doubles down on her reactivity and directness, making her deceivingly seem like an ESFP at times. But this enneagram is known to be "justice seekers" and strive to maintain control over environments -- often complimentary to Te. Some of you are voting based on personal feelings, and just because you don't like someone doesn't mean they can't fall into a type that you "usually" like. Any type can be a comedian or an activist, it's not bound by certain types. It's more about environment and how one is brought up.
