Seven MBTI 성격 유형

Seven 성격 유형

인격
전기
인격 correlate
비슷한 캐릭터
특성과 특성

인격

"Seven은 어떤 성격 유형입니까? Seven은 mbti의 INTJ 성격 유형입니다. enneagram의 8w7 - sp/sx - 873, big 5의 RCOEI, socionics의 ILI입니다."

Upon revision, I've came to a conclusion that Seven is an encapsulation of social 5's intellectualist elitism (note: his relationship with another scientist, Kelvin, as well as latter's research group shall be taken into account), most evident by his prominent respect towards Dynamo's work, alongside Ivy's, as it fits his 'visionary' criteria. He's considered to be reclusive and hideous by Lady Geist's old money liking (assuming he is the mentioned Edric) and generally an unfavorable person amongst common folk, thus providing a compelling argument against interest in material wealth and institute of reputation (excluding 2 & 3 from his tritype as a result). He appears to be enneagram 8 due to his growth from 5, as well as having aforementioned two in his tritype, but impulsivity is not a vice of his. We can't really tell how introverted he was before which would be helpful in this research, but what we do see is a prideful semi-triumphant disposition which is constantly mocked by everyone who picks up on his insecurity of not being all that untouchable, far removed from mere mortals: 'You are miles away from the god you wish you were, Seven!' – the Doorman. Speaking of functions, however, his dichotomous categorical worldview based on 'worthy-worthless' is quite apparent, which is often found in Te-Fi axis, supported by his weapon's name – «Cold Calculus», hinting at Fi being often overlooked. Se appears to be a function he somewhat want to thrive in as he goes through his 'ascension', but him never considering trying to remove electrocution device from his head (conversation with Mcginnis, confident Se-aux) points out how poor his sensory perception is. Not to mention said 'hat' obstructs his sight at least partially, so you'd think of removing it the moment you get out of your imprisonment if you'd care. He does have vision figuratively, nevertheless, as he pursues the ambiguous «Apotheosis», proclaiming himself a 'visionary', as well as planning ahead in dialogue with Haze, Mo & Krill, Paradox. Original argument is now replaced as conclusion on it's inaccuracy was reached. It will be left in the comments for archival purposes.