The Girl with the Blue Flower (Painting) MBTI 성격 유형
인격
"The Girl with the Blue Flower (Painting)은 어떤 성격 유형입니까? The Girl with the Blue Flower (Painting)은 mbti의 ESTJ 성격 유형입니다. enneagram의 7w8 - sp/sx - 783, big 5의 SCUEN, socionics의 입니다."
Hello, I'm back. I was the one who started the ESTJ consensus with a (now deleted) comment saying that I would elaborate when I get my shite together. Now that I've returned knowing more than I did 3 years ago and played again, I think I'm more confident giving my analysis as to why I still think she is an ESTJ. Note that I will be mostly referencing Day 7 since that's the only time we actually meet her. ~ Te-Si ~ "I forgot everything as I sat here in the dark. Why I was painted... Who painted me... What that model--that girl was thinking... I kept feeling something wasn't right. And so, I began to think I wasn't complete." I can see why people voted Se-dom, but this is likely due to her acting as her model who has the Se in her stack. Take our quote above. The first thing she observed out of her decline was her inability to recollect information, an indicator that she relies on Si. If it were Se, she would've mulled over her inability to sense information "Why I couldn't see... Where I was... " Here, she also applies Te logic application out of her Si inner observations (I am a portrait with something missing within, therefore I must be a work-in-progress that has to be finished to fill that gap). From the moment she appeared to us, her objective couldn't have been any clearer— to be completed, but the process is linearly set according to her model's routine. Te-Si typically wants something done step-by-step. We sketch the motifs, paint it, and a colour appears on her. However, the colour has to be specific to her instructions which happens to be the same instructions across all other victims. It's too rigid for a Se-dom who might change things up. ~ Si-Ne vs Se-Ni ~ (I'll get back to this. I swear it won't be in 3 years this time.) ~ Inferior Fi ~ "I am a portrait, so... I tried to act like that girl who was my model." I know this is oversimplifying it, but it is what it is; she has no personal values or an identity. She may be her own person, but she remained steadfast to the fact that she was just a painting. When she recounts her story from the perspective of her model, she tells us her opinions based on the objective rationality behind it, saying that her death had something to do with the sister's curse and that it was embarrassingly foolish. There are dialogues where she says how she feels for a thing, but it's usually told from objective lens first and foremost.
