I'm Ok (Even Though They Aren't) MBTI 성격 유형
인격
"I'm Ok (Even Though They Aren't)은 어떤 성격 유형입니까? I'm Ok (Even Though They Aren't)은 mbti의 INFP 성격 유형입니다. enneagram의 9w1 - sp/so - 927, big 5의 RLUAI, socionics의 IEI입니다."
For people arguing fe; id suggest you read about functions because either you’re mistyping people or you’ve just never actually read Jung’s stuff. “They neither shine nor reveal themselves. Since they submit the control of their lives to their subjectively orientated feeling, their true motives generally remain concealed. Their outward demeanour is harmonious and inconspicuous; they reveal a delightful repose, a sympathetic parallelism, which has no desire to affect others, either to impress, influence, or change them in any way.” That’s the massive difference between fi and fe; the fe user desires to be affirmâtes and validated by its environnement whereas the fi desires for no environnemental affirmation (they may désire objective affirmation but not human affirmation). People who are saying they’re not ok or acting like a pick me or reaching to find external affirmation aren’t fi users; you’re mistyping them when in reality they’re fe users. So stop saying you’ve met a ton of fi users who show all their emotion in their faces because in theory that’s more of an fe thing than an fi thing. Please for once in your effing life could you PLEASE not type by stereotypes? I swear most real INFPs come off as Intjs or INTPs on first glance. Fi users can be horrible when unhealthy but generally the unhealthy fi user is more obviously selfish and doesn’t make an effort to seek validation. I’m not gonna say one function is better than the other but there’s a massive difference between fi and fe and people are misconstruing it because they’ve started just generally associating a ton of negative behaviors with fi that are actually fe.
