Machi Komacine typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
highly disagreeing with any PREFERENCE for intuition here. she doesn't fit at all how Jung portrayed intuitive dominance - high Socio Ni in the Model A, for instance, manifests itself through a lack of direct attention to the world around oneself and a sense of detachment or freedom from worldly affairs - while Machi does seem to be quite grounded and a rule follower rather than a visionary (i.e. unlike Chrollo himself who's a true Socio Ni Ego and Ni-dom). this "Socio Ni detachment" i mentioned usually leads to a highly developed imagination and a very unique mental world, but it can also result in a great deal of laziness and apparent inactivity - in addition to them being generally labeled as weird people and very close to antisocials. Ni Base types of people are pretty much your typical storyteller fantasy-lover, abstraction + books-obsessed. Intuition seems to Machi like the last and ultimately unstable resource despite her accidentally having the fame for accurate hunches. sidenote: accuracy ≠ preference - you don't have "wrong" Feelings or values/morals just by being dominant Thinking type (look at Kant) - it just happens that F-doms are more in contact with what it provides. also IxFPs usually give amoral villains... would they be Te-dom for having wrong Feelings? lmfao. that's ****** criteria. i used "accidentally" up there while referring to Machi's because intuitive hunches are ultimately abstract which means it detaches itself from the chance of being stable due to the instinctive/irrational nature of its distance from reality. honestly, a lot of ISTPs are also known for successful mundane predictions because the sort of info they naturally harbor is sensory, thus detailed, precise and empirical - uniting all these stored concrete experiences, you create this arsenal that helps you with a variety of situations in >mundane affairs<. if you think you're intuitive uniquely for having accurate irl hunches - my dude, it is time to reconsider your type. https://www.jungiananalysts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/C.-G.-Jung-Collected-Works-Volume-6_-Psychological-Types.pdf search in the summary for the Introverted Intuitive Type (i know Jung's typology is different from MBTI and Socionics by default, but it's expected for a "INxJ IxI" to be nicely close to Jung's Ni type, right, sir?) stacks are not about quality inherent in the manifestation of a given function. quality you can estimate much more by how healthy an individual is... stacks are more about preference/value and how many horizons in a given function you usually clear. raw quality in information would be a consequence of that.
