Folly (dream parasite) typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
𝔽𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕚𝕤 𝕒 𝕊𝕖𝕩𝕦𝕒𝕝 𝔽𝕠𝕦𝕣 (𝕊𝕏𝟜) This woman has been on my mind way too much for the past couple of days, so a good, in-depth personality analysis (the first one on this page, no offense to y’all) might be a way to get her out of my head. However, this analysis is unlike any I have ever done. When analyzing a personality, I always just go over the character’s MBTI type and functions, along with their Enneagram (including their instinctual stack and tritype), and I leave the rest up to interpretation. I give equal importance to both typing systems. But with this analysis, I’m going to just go over one of these systems briefly because the other is quite the hot take, at least from what I see with the consensus. But I will give my reasoning as to why I think this way, even comparing with other Enneagrams and debunking them. (Plus, this is the first time I’ve ever given one of my analyses a title and sections. Trying something new here!) So, after carefully analyzing Folly’s personality, including her description, some trivia, and her in-game dialogue...here is my conclusion as to what she actually is. So let’s begin. 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐲'𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 I will, again, keep this section brief, as this isn’t the crux of my comment. But after some consideration, I have deduced that Folly is an INTJ. Here are her cognitive functions, as well as some explanations: 𝗡𝗶: Deeply future-oriented and focused on her own destiny and autonomy. (“𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘦.”) Speaks abstractly, symbolically, and often cryptically; reflects on larger meanings, archetypes, and dreams. Has a need for control; has poetic and prophetic speech; and has an obsession with inevitability and fate. 𝗧𝗲: Strategic, calculating, and speaks with decisive logic. Has a scorn for weakness and futility. (“𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘦.”) Her actions are governed more by reason than sentiment; any relationships she DOES have are about usefulness, not devotion. 𝗙𝗶: Personally wounded and shaped by past betrayal. Values are internalized and not openly expressed. Holds grudges but buries them under sardonic cruelty. 𝗦𝗲: Shown in her disdain for others’ physical gestures or flamboyant actions. Finds the material and sensory world shallow unless it’s a means to control others. Inflicts sensory experience (i.e., terrors in others’ dreams) without wanting to live in it. 𝐒𝐗𝟒 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐲 To me, Folly presents herself as a tragic character who feels she is unworthy of love, as shown in her self-loathing, bitterness about the past, and rejection of any gifts the player gives her. This is coupled with her intensity, theatrical cruelty, and poetic nihilism. “𝘐 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘺...𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘱.” “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 ‘𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴’ 𝘨𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴.” “𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳. 𝘕𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯.” These statements, to me, represent someone who has been deeply emotionally wounded, and as such made this suffering a part of her identity. She doesn’t just remember her pain...she embodies it. Her detachment and reflectiveness on her pain also paves way for her 5 wing. She craves knowledge not for practical use, but to better understand her own pain. This, my friends, paves the way for her instinctual subtype: Sexual Four. To better understand why, we shall take a look at what it means to be a SX4. Naranjo states, “𝙸𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝙴𝟺 𝚜𝚞𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚢𝚙𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚛𝚎, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝙴𝟺 𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚋𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜𝚏𝚢 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚜.” In addition, Beatrice Chestnut states, “𝚂𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝙵𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜 '𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛' 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚛𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚝 𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚣𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚗. 𝙽𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚘 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝙵𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚞𝚙 𝚋𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚑𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚎, '𝙷𝚄𝚁𝚃 𝙿𝙴𝙾𝙿𝙻𝙴 𝙷𝚄𝚁𝚃 𝙿𝙴𝙾𝙿𝙻𝙴.'”
