Jim Halpert typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
The fact that this character is typed as 9 is still one of the most baffling things on this website. Especially when quite literally everything about his personality matches up with almost everything around the 7. The behaviours, the defence mechanisms, everything, and yet people are voting him as 9 because he "Fears conflict." The following is a clarification made by Naranjo on how types 7 and 9 can be confused: "These may be confused, because ***the passive and lazy characteristics, sometimes present in E VII, are interpreted as an expression of the E IX ruling passion.*** One difference is that the ***intense fantasy life of E VII*** contrasts with the lack of interiority of E IX. Another, the ***foxy astuteness and subtlety of E VII*** which contrast to the lack of subtlety and the naivete of the "Sancho Panza" syndrome. Furthermore the self-indulgence of E VII contrasts markedly with the capacity of E IX to postpone his desires and to over-adjust to the milieu. Furthermore, while ***gluttony leads to psychological complexification***, however, psychological laziness leads to over-simplification." Do those highlighted parts sound familiar at all? They should, because they are huge aspects of Jim's personality. Intense fantasy, subtlety, and psychological complexities are fundamental aspects of Jim's character as the office pranker, and all of these act in opposition to the typically soft-minded and relaxation-oriented type 9. Do you know who is soft-minded an relaxation-oriented, showing many of the characteristics of enneagram type 9? Pam. Pam is such a better example of the 9 than Jim is, and displays much of the characteristics of the type. In case that wasn't enough, the defence mechanism of the 7, known as rationalisation, is extremely prevalent within Jim, especially in his pranks. This defence mechanism is described as " the invention of a reason for an attitude or action the motive of which is not acknowledged. Though it is not always regarded as a defense mechanism, there is enough reason to claim that it is, for even though it does not entail the inhibition of impulse (but, rather, the opposite), it does involve a distraction of attention from the "real reasons" for a person's attitudes and actions, and in making such actions appear as good and noble, it satisfies the demands of the superego." This kind of defence mechanism can be seen throughout Jim's personality and his pranks, and they are one of the biggest sources of frustration for Dwight. Two of these in particular come into mind. Jim: Im just saying you can't be sure it wasn't you [who smoked the joint.] Dwight: That's ridiculous, of course it wasn't me! Jim: Marijuana is a memory loss drug, so maybe you forgot that you smoked it. Dwight: That's not how it works! Jim: Now how do you know how it works? Here, Jim is using what appear to be logical deductions and conclusions in order to justify the belief that Dwight was the one who used the joint. However, as I think we are all aware, Jim is not using this logic for the sake of actually finding the culprit, but rather he is using this as an excuse to tease Dwight for his own amusement, and there the defence mechanism of rationalisation can be seen perfectly in action. There also exists this scene wherein Jim plays the role of a client during a training session for Dwight. Rationalisation can also be seen here: Dwight (In character): What is your name, sir? Jim (also in character): I am Bill Buttlicker. Dwight: ...really, that's your real name? Jim: How dare you! My family built this country by the way! Obviously the name "Bill Buttlicker" was chosen intentionally to annoy Dwight, and it does indeed annoy him, but Jim tries to justify it by continuing to play his character, who seems to be ignoring the profanities in his surname, instead focusing upon Dwight's insults. Thus, the defence mechanism of rationalisation can be seen once again, this time ethical rather than logical in nature. It is this very same rationalisation which Jim employs whenever Dwight tries to challenge him on his stupid behaviour, it can even be seen in the scene wherein Jim tries to imitate Dwight's look. This is not a one-off thing. This is not just him having a 7-fix. These listed characteristics define Jim, almost everything I've read about The Office instantly makes a point to mention how incredibly mischievous and clever Jim is when it comes to pranking his co-workers, even depicting him as THE office prankster among the cast. It's what he's known for, it is what stands out about him the most, JIM HALPERT IS A 7.
Biografia
#JohnKrasinski
Osobowość correlate
Michael Scott
Pam Beesly
Dwight K. Schrute
Stanley Hudson
Ryan Howard
Kelly Kapoor
Kevin Malone
Andy Bernard
