Sunk-Cost Fallacy тип личности MBTI
Личность
"Какой тип личности является Sunk-Cost Fallacy? Sunk-Cost Fallacy - это тип личности ESTJ в mbti, 3w2 - SO3 - в Enneagram, в Big 5, в Socionics."
The Sunk-Cost fallacy is a phenomenon whereby a person is reluctant or refuses to abandon a situation because they have heavily invested in it despite evidence that abandonment is more beneficial. When someone continues engaging in behaviour that is harmful due to the resources they have already spent they are committing a Sunk-Cost fallacy. It is a reasoning akin to 'Since I already started, might as well keep going (...) even if it is to my own detriment'. While this fallacy tends to apply to situations regarding financial investment—having its name to thank to 'sunk cost', which refers to [financial] costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered—this fallacy can also apply in broader contexts.
биография
A sunk cost (also throwing good money after bad) is the resources (such as money, manpower, or time) that have been expended on a project and cannot be recovered. In analyses of failed or failing projects, a common practice (the sunk cost fallacy) is to allocate more resources (that might be effectively used elsewhere) solely because giving up would mean earlier efforts have been wasted. While sunk cost commonly (but not always) refers to money or similar costs, an alternative, more general term is escalation of commitment, which refers to the tendency of people and organisations to continue in the same direction, doing the same thing as before, even if it is clearly leading to failure. The fallacy is an informal fallacy.
