{{ชื่อ}} ประเภทบุคลิกภาพ MBTI
บุคลิกภาพ
"Natasha Leggero ประเภทบุคลิกภาพประเภทใด Natasha Leggero เป็นประเภทบุคลิกภาพ ใน mbti, 3w4 - so/sx - 371 ใน Enneagram, ใน Big 5, EIE ใน Socionics"
I want to argue ISFP Why ? I think she uses Se and Fi. And I think an ESFP would be wilder. She has this almost distinguished attitude, definitely not "I desperately need attention and would go to any length to obtain it". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi_H0qAoTs4 Arguments for Se (I only used the first minutes because there was enough) - she imitates different voices well and often (accents, speed, tone). (0:00-0:15) (1:15-1:22) - she looks so at ease, like she's not even on a stage. (the whole video) - not only she speaks about the tangible reality, she speaks about precise observations of tangible details. She makes jumps that can seem wild, OK, but that doesn't necessarily means Ne... Fi is not the most "obvious path of thought" function + Fi loves to exaggerate so people get the point (so people get the magnitude of Fi really) (0:19-0:27) you could argue that the link in the comparision is quasi inexistant and comes from Ne, but it's also an excuse to talk about the headsets and _how they look_, and "your boyfriend jerking off while hanging himself" is a superposition of images that are Se-blunt, the result is Fi-traumatizing, not Fe-we're keeping good vibes like, not Ti-logical, that points to Fi rather than Ti or Fe (plus, have I mentionned Fi might exaggerate sometimes to get a point across without any respect to logic?) (0:30-0:33) protecting a couch while eating a sandwich ? Most S subject ever, few N would think about that sort of thing let alone _talk about it_ (0:40-0:46) "when Napoleon was your age, he conquered half of Europe" ohh it's not linked, so she obviously uses Ne... Well, I don't agree, the link was the age 40 and the quote is actually an extremely tangible fact, very Se-impressive "half of Europe" can you imagine, also, he is a "conqueror", a man of action. (0:51-1:06) enumeration of _tangible facts_ (2:15-3:01) a long string a thought alimented by observations of details and their adequate summarizing with comparisions, ended by a blunt and surprising image. - she is really observant and reactive (0:30-0:35) she immediately changed the subject when she was someone (not in the first rank) nodded, to ask him about oh, tangible details - she loves to interact with the audience (she loves to just randomly talk with someone from the audience so she can react with a joke) (0:51-0:55) I could go on for the whole video because there's SO MUCH Se in there. Let's argument Fi, it's harder. At the end, she tells a story about how she had a bad interaction with someone, someone whom she made up her mind about in the story. Typical Fi. (8:43-8:52) "I start freaking out because I think I have offended her" is a huge Fi feel bad. Fe would : feel/observe that the other person is feeling bad IF they feel bad, and (try to) do something. Fi-users just start to "freak out". They don't feel discomfort by empathy, they feel bad about themselves : Fi didn't notice that the other person was uncomfortable, no no, Fi has a pre-conceived idea of what the other might feel (they might feel really BAD) if the Fi-user doesn't behave according to their standards (even if it's not on purpose, like in her story). Fi considers it its duty to do the right thing when the right thing is obvious, and that generally involves not offending people. All in all, Fi would definitely remember, think and tell others about that sort of moment because it's a problem they don't want to encounter anymore (so they remind themselves, and maybe collect advice). I don't think Fe recounts as often the moments where they "failed", because well, it doesn't make people inclined to trust you + they probably managed to make it up to this person. (8:52-9:05) OK, what happened here ? Fi-user made an Fi-apology : they tried to make the possibly offended person understand that they meant no agression and no offense by admitting something bad about themselves and putting themselves in a vulnerable position. And the possibly offended person just made fun of the admission, implying that NL was stuck up and boring. This is a very Fi-bad behaviour since the Fi-user put themselves in a vulnerable position on purpose, revealing their positive intent, and yet the other person chose to take advantage of the vulnerability. No morals. Think about it, why would a Ti-user tell this story?? A Ti-user wouldn't be shocked by someone taking advantage of a vulnerability if the vibe was bad + they wouldn't be as offended by 'you're boring and unoriginal' said by someone they don't even know. A Fi-user would tell this because it was a very emotional episode : they freaked out about their behaviour, made the Fi-right thing to do by Fi-making amends (and it's not easy to just be vulnerable as a Fi-user, they protect themselves a lot), the person wasn't on the same page at all and didn't do the Fi-right thing, the Fi-user probably hated them at that moment.
ชีวประวัติ
Natasha Leggero (born March 26, 1974) is an American actress, comedian, and writer. She rose to fame after appearing as the host of MTV's The 70s House (2005), and for her tenure as a regular roundtable panelist on Chelsea Handler's late-night talk show Chelsea Lately.
