{{ชื่อ}} ประเภทบุคลิกภาพ MBTI
บุคลิกภาพ
"Sabine Callas “Viper” ประเภทบุคลิกภาพประเภทใด Sabine Callas “Viper” เป็นประเภทบุคลิกภาพ ใน mbti, 6w5 - sx/sp - 648 ใน Enneagram, RLOEN ใน Big 5, LSI ใน Socionics"
It saddens me to see that, despite all the new design's pizzazz, this site's toxic habits have never changed, and we still see profiles brigaded by users who know very little, but barely shift the vote by exasperating everyone else in the comment section, answering everything, and twisting already precarious definitions they found on random websites, with everyone else who knows even less following along. Therefore, since the aformentioned users are lamenting that INTJ voters have no arguments, let me make one, with extensive knowledge on my side coming from proper theory read from several books. I'm also letting them know I won't play their game by answering further comments or debating. I know my stuff and that's enough. TeFi is agreed upon, let's move it out of the way and focus on percepitve axes. First of all, typing someone Si dominant, or Si user at all, because they focus on the past, shows a lack of understanding of what Si is and does. Si is a perceptive function. Memory, remembrance, obsession with the past...none of these are a form of perception. Si as memory is an unfortunate surviving relic of Isabel Myer's distortion of Jung's definitions. A prominent INTJ character from a famous IP, Harry Potter's Severus Snape, is extremely obsessed with his past, and constantly brought back to it by the present, for instance by Potter having his mother's eyes; yet he is undoubtedly INTJ. Why is that? Let's get into the specifics of Si(Ne) and Ni(Se), and it will be clear for both of these INTJs showing the same tendencies. I will be referencing Micheal Pierce and his definitions; if you hear something you haven't before, it comes from there. NeSi is an axis incapable of approaching reality directly. It is an axis that doubts perception. This happens because Si is a function that, contrary to Se, does not take in perception of reality "as is", but rather the impression that reality leaves to its user. The person is however aware that their (and everyone else's) perceptions of reality are subjective and personal; therefore they look to gather enough pieces to put together a composite, abstract approximation of reality -a process that happens through Ne, and that is what makes NeSi perception appreciative of breadth, rather than of depth like SeNi. The result of this is that Si users, since their Ne is repressed and needs a lot of effort to expand as widely as that of Ne users, will be cautious and need a lot of information to steer away from what they currently perceive is the safest method, path and worldview. They're meticulous and move slowly through concepts to make sure the famous "Si internal map" is working properly. There is a slowness of thought that comes from making sure everything is in its place and is ultimately thorough and detaild when a result is reached. SeNi, on the contrary, is an axis that greatly trusts direct observation, as Se takes in external reality exactly as it is. "My perception is your perception as long as we're looking at the same thing through the same means", Se, because reality is seen as impersonal and something outside of the self, rather than approximated by a personal impression. This makes people on the SeNi exis sure of themselves, of their "sight" where Se is more prominent, and of the interpretations and implications of what has been observed, where Ni is. The Ni user, consequently, will talk with a strong amount of trust in their perception, which becomes a truth they can see clearly and will guide them through the next piece of action. People on this axis are quicker than Si users in forming their conclusions and worldviews; they don't need all the pieces, they need something to work with and will extrapolate from there. Ni users are nowhere as quick as Se users, who elaborate stimuli at a way faster pace, but are nowher as cautious as Si in drawing conclusions, if anything, they delight themselves in recklessly visionary concepts even where details miss because of repressed Se. All of this said, where exactly is Sabine cautious? Where is she slow or uncertain in perception? Where is she "methodically walking the beaten path", unable to stray from it until a bigger composite picture reveals itself? Sabine is no pillar of accumulated Si perceptions, she's quite the opposite: impetuous, quick, visionary as we know from her work in the lore, and ultimately sure-footed in both what she sees, SeNi, and how she acts, TeFi. If anything, she's impulsive in a way that fits inferior Se extremely well. Trauma and anything related to it should have no say in this. Whoever believes that will please care to explain me how would they unravel a situation where a character that never showed Si before, is put through something traumatic they can't help going back to or thinking about - that's how trauma works, triggers yeet you right to the moment you were traumatized. Did they suddenly magically develop Si? Two months in and I'm already tired. Never change PDB.
ชีวประวัติ
The American chemist, Viper deploys an array of poisonous chemical devices to control the battlefield and cripple the enemy's vision. If the toxins don't kill her prey, her mind games surely will. Her basic abilities include Snake Bite, a vial that creates a pool of toxic chemicals that damages enemies and increases the damage they take, and Poison Cloud, a device that emits a cloud of toxic gas, and can be picked up from the ground to place somewhere else. Her signature ability is Toxic Screen, a row of devices that emit a wall of toxic gas. Both Poison Cloud and Toxic Screen work on a rechargeable fuel meter; if the meter is empty, neither device can emit gas, and having both abilities active depletes fuel more quickly. Her ultimate ability is Viper's Pit, a massive gas cloud that persists as long as Viper is inside it. All who step into her gas will be nearsighted and enemies will be highlighted in red to Viper, though she still has the same range of vision that everyone else does
บุคลิกภาพ correlate
Tala Nicole Dimaapi Valdez "Neon"
Klara Böhringer "Killjoy"
Mateo Armendáriz De la Fuente "Gecko"
Jamie Adeyemi "Phoenix"
Vincent Fabron "Chamber"
Ling Ying Wei "Sage"
Sunwoo Han "Jett"
Amir El Amari "Cypher"