{{ชื่อ}} ประเภทบุคลิกภาพ MBTI
บุคลิกภาพ
"British Mapper ประเภทบุคลิกภาพประเภทใด British Mapper เป็นประเภทบุคลิกภาพ ISTJ ใน mbti, 4w5 - sx/so - 146 ใน Enneagram, RLUEI ใน Big 5, LSE ใน Socionics"
Anyone who truly understands cognitive functions and is not influenced by stereotypes associated with MBTI or cognitive functions will recognise that British Mapper is clearly an ISTJ. I recall that she was originally typed as a Si-dominant or auxiliary until she publicly stated a different MBTI type. Initially, she was considered an ESFJ, and then widely agreed upon as an ISFJ. However, after she mentioned that she received INFJ on one of her test results, many people immediately accepted it and changed their assessment to INFJ. Later, when she claimed to be an INTP, people again altered their views accordingly. Subsequently, some began suggesting she might be an INFP, which, due to her evident Fi and Si, made more sense, and she eventually adopted the INFP label. I believe people are far too easily swayed. Ironically, their initial assessments were more accurate, as she is clearly a Si-dominant. Let us first address the stereotypes and misconceptions. Ne does not equate to creativity. Any type can be creative. While Ne users are more inclined to brainstorm and explore ideas, which may make them appear more creative, creativity itself is not exclusive to Ne. For instance, Andjela, Margeshau, Faherkleasna, and LGBTQ Mapper are not Ne users, yet they are more creative than 99% of people. This shows that Ne encompasses more than creativity. Ne involves considering multiple possibilities, attempting to understand others’ thought processes, and exploring alternative viewpoints. It is also inherently abstract. It involves seeking meaning beneath the surface, not merely logical deduction. Beyond generating a few creative ideas, I see very little Ne in British Mapper. Her general intuitive and abstract thinking is significantly overrated and often confused with logical analysis. I will address this further shortly. Why do I assert that she is Si-dominant? British Mapper has shown little change over the years. A common misconception is that all Si-doms are productive. In reality, Si-doms tend to engage in familiar and comforting activities for long periods, which can be mistaken for productivity. She does not appear to change her goals. She has one imagined objective and sticks to it. Ne users frequently question their motives, goals, and actions, whereas she remains straightforward. Occasionally, she presents a new idea, but that is the extent of it. Her posts consistently revolve around drama or her personal views, a trend that has persisted for years. What particularly identifies her as a Si user is her groundedness. Her Si is far healthier than that of many other Si-doms, such as Srbskiy, who is extremely stubborn, close-minded, and unwilling to consider opposing perspectives. British Mapper, by contrast, does not attack or hate others for disagreeing with her. However, she still lacks genuine openness to others’ viewpoints. She firmly believes that her opinions, ideologies, and values are valid as long as they feel right to her. Regardless of the strength of opposing arguments, she is unlikely to change her mind. She will only reconsider her beliefs if she personally chooses to do so, which seems improbable. While she makes an effort to be respectful, her ability to genuinely consider other perspectives, acknowledge the possibility of being wrong, or seek common ground is limited. This tendency stems from a combination of Si and Fi. There is also a widespread misunderstanding that using one’s own logic equates to being a Ti user. This is incorrect. Both Ti and Te involve personal reasoning. The key distinction lies in how this reasoning is formed. Te develops logic based on external sources and objective observations, and that is precisely what British Mapper does. She analyses the external world, collects information, and then forms conclusions based on her analysis. This is quintessential Te. Ti, by contrast, constructs an internal logical framework, often independently of external data. That is why it is called introverted thinking. It does not rely on external information. Additionally, British Mapper is highly detail-oriented, which I noticed from the very beginning. She meticulously observes even the smallest details and then uses them to formulate logical conclusions. This process is characteristic of Si-Te interaction. She is not intuitive. She is analytical. A good contrast is Korac, who focuses less on details and more on the broader picture. Korac uses his intuition, insight, and ability to envision possibilities to understand people or situations. He does not require concrete data to form insights. British Mapper, by contrast, pieces together small facts to form a conclusion. What she refers to as intuition is, in reality, logical deduction. She is intelligent, but her intuition is overrated because people confuse it with analytical thinking. (1/2) Check my reply, there is a second part.
ชีวประวัติ
https://youtu.be/O_mQLzrFaS4?si=d2qC2nPG5fZpkovt
บุคลิกภาพ correlate
LGBTQ mapper (Before Joker Seven)
Belle Delphine
Christine Weston Chandler "Chris Chan"
SNEAKO
Raspby
First French Edits
Vitor Santos (Metaforando)
Bethy (@mbtibethy)
