{{ชื่อ}} ประเภทบุคลิกภาพ MBTI
บุคลิกภาพ
"Juror #10 ประเภทบุคลิกภาพประเภทใด Juror #10 เป็นประเภทบุคลิกภาพ ESFJ ใน mbti, 3w4 - sx/so - 368 ใน Enneagram, SLOEN ใน Big 5, LSE ใน Socionics"
He definitely cares more about people and social issues (Fe) than things and logistical issues (Te). This is further evidenced by the fact that he expected everyone to agree with his rant at the end, grasping to find *anyone* who would listen (Fe). He even turns to juror #4 and says "you agree with me, right?" He only changed his verdict because no one would listen to him (Fe). This also seems like anger at his inability to control the social atmosphere (Fe-base). He raised his voice, slathered his words with emotional appeal and yet no one would entertain him. ESE. Contrast this to juror #3 who sticks by his view regardless of whether people agreed with him or not. He cared more about being right (Te) than agreed with (Fe). Therefore, I would say that he is an Fe-dom. He also based his "guilty" verdict on his past experience of "these people do bad things, therefore they will always be bad". Even if the evidence stacked against his views, he kept prioritising what a collective group has done in the past (Fe-Si) over reason. This is why I believe he is an ESFJ, and certainly an unhealthy one.
ชีวประวัติ
As described in the original screenplay: "46 years old. Garage owner, An angry, bitter man. A man who antagonizes almost at sight. A bigot who places no values on any human life save his own. A man who has been nowhere and is going nowhere and knows it deep within him. He has a bad cold and continually blows his nose, sniffs a Benzedrine inhaler, etc."
