Char Aznable MBTI性格类型
性格
"Char Aznable是什么人格？ Char Aznable是MBTI中的人格类型，九型中的8w9 - so/sp - 217，五大类型中的SCOAI，Socionics中EIE类型。"
Arguments based on a person's formal works or formal/public speech are actually not a good thing to do. People forgot that they are in "formal" conditions, which indicate that it is scripted, merely constructed, reviewed, and then finally executed as so. “Extraverted thinking, therefore, need not necessarily be a merely concretistic thinking it may equally well be a purely ideal thinking,..." -Jung Another mistake is simply to think that Te is a function that merely deals with what the outer object tells/indicate to us what to do. Jung argues that Te in overall is actually the function (especially if dominant), to be the most moralistic out of all. For, who else would speak of what's right and wrong other than those who claim they know what "fact" is and which belongs to such category? Te is all about making intellectuals' conclusions, oriented by objective data, objective facts, or generally valid ideas, that is what a Te dom is described as. Their words is that of truth only, as they deem so. Had humans been proved as a vermin through history then surely he would consider them as a threat, since the objective facts are present there, and no one could argue they did not, even Amuro only able to use "potential" as an argument; defending mankind that they would eventually able to change and correct themselves later on. “This type of man gives the deciding voice-not merely for himself alone but also on behalf of his entourage-either to the actual objective reality or to its objectively orientated, intellectual formula. By this formula are good and evil measured, and beauty and ugliness determined. All is right that corresponds with this formula; all is wrong that contradicts it; and everything that is neutral to it is purely accidental. Because this formula seems to correspond with the meaning of the world, it also becomes a world-law whose realization must be achieved at all times and seasons, both individually and collectively. Just as the extraverted thinking type subordinates himself to his formula, so, for its own good, must his entourage also obey it, since the man who refuses to obey is wrong -- he is resisting the world-law, and is, therefore, unreasonable, immoral, and without a conscience. His moral code forbids him to tolerate exceptions; his ideal must, under all circumstances, be realized; for in his eyes it is the purest conceivable formulation of objective reality, and, therefore, must also be generally valid truth, quite indispensable for the salvation of man. This is not from any great love for his neighbour, but from a higher standpoint of justice and truth. Everything in his own nature that appears to invalidate this formula is mere imperfection, an accidental miss-fire, something to be eliminated on the next occasion, or, in the event of further failure, then clearly a sickness.” -Jung
