The End Justifies The Means MBTI -Persönlichkeitstyp
Persönlichkeit
"Welcher Persönlichkeitstyp ist {profilename}? {profilename} ist ein {MBTI} -Persönlichkeitstyp in MBTI, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} in EnneArgram, {big5} in Big 5, {socionics} in Socionics."
From an ethical standpoint the pillar of beneficence gained in the end has to surpass any other pillars it violates such as justice, autonomy, or non-maleficence. For example, killing one person to save two people would be the end justifying the means. 2 > 1, the beneficence surpasses the violation non-maleficence. This is how I view things even if it’s supposedly a Te thing. Keep in mind it’s easier to weigh the pros and cons when its numerical like in this situation, but with things concerning our autonomy it’s more subjective.
