1. Gente y Personajes
  2. Internet
  3. Social, Cultural & Political Commentators

Kyle Kulinski (Secular Talk) tipo de personalidade mbti

Personalidade

"¿Qué tipo de personalidad es Kyle Kulinski (Secular Talk)? Kyle Kulinski (Secular Talk) es un tipo de personalidad ENTJ en mbti, 1w2 - so/sp - 153 en enneagram, RCUEI en Big 5, LSI en Socionics."

Kyle is not an LIE but instead an LSI: Kyle epitomizes Ti base in his penchant and love for ideology and consistency. Kyle points out the flawed logic of his opponent in his videos and forceully promotes his ideas, arguing cogently for them while maintaining a level of objectivity. He frequently criticizes those that he deems lacking in principle. Kyle's litmus tests and need for progressive purity in ideology fit beta rational nicely. An argument for Ne-polr can be made in his stubbornness and inability to accept or listen to constructive criticism to the Justice Democrats and failing to take into consideration that said organization could backfire and have some of its prominent members become corporate sellouts. This also illustrates Ni hidden agenda: to believe. While having vision is great, Ni-mobilizing manifests in extreme, costly tunnel vision at times. More evidence for Se-valuation is him heavily promoting a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party with the introduction of the Justice Democrats. An LII would be hesitant to do so because they are woefully inadequate in Se matters and would rather engage in discussion, as opposed to addressing the issue head-on. Alpha NTs like LIIs really emphasize the importance of the free marketplace of ideas. Dave Rubin, an ESE who preaches this but fails to live up to it, comes to mind LOL. Nothing really gets done as Se and Te are devalued. Instead discussion replaces action. Contrast this with Beta STs who openly advocate for a higher position in the social hierarchy by assertively pushing their opinions forward. They are passionate and zealous in doing so. This is a key difference in quadra values between alpha and beta and Kyle fits the latter. One striking thing that seemingly goes against Se-valuation that made me question the LSI typing, would be his claim that he is conflict-avoidant. On the surface this is compelling, but this is ultimately ******** when you further analyze it. He can say that all he wants about supposedly "hating" conflict but when he makes multiple videos engaging in the very conflict that he claims to "despise", that claim plops right into the shitter. At the end of the day, actions always speak louder than words. He still did it regardless of what he said, repeatedly. An xII would try way harder to avoid this. LSIs despite valuing Se, are ultimately very flexible with their Se as it is in the creative slot. They're IJ temperament, making them cautious and risk-averse. Not to mention that they are also Fi role, so attempts at diplomacy and peace-making are not uncommon. LIIs are all of the last three points too but Kyle's take on the hostile takeover of the Democratic Party combined with his litmus tests and passion for consistency destroy the notion that he is Se-polr. He also believes in holding politicians accountable instead of passively spouting their ideas. More force. More Se. Kyle's Fi-role is clear in his mindless need to suddenly play patty-cake with both sides during the Jimmy Dore vs. TYT war despite it not benefiting him at all. His intentions were innocent but the result sucked for him in the end as he never chose a side and rode the fence. Betas hate ambiguity in the social realm and everybody involved in the main drama was Beta Quadra. He failed to assertively stick to his guns and stand his own ground. It seemed very forced and it led to him having no friends in the end. Dore hates him and he is no longer with the TYT Network. Use that Se more Kyle. The way Kyle ***** on Andrew Yang (LIE) for being inconsistent (1:20 mark), for falling for "sheep thinking + I thought you cared about policy" (2:35-2:50 mark) makes LSI super evident and is the best example of illusory relations that I can find: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tXOEsqGa5Y A decent example of an LIE would be Krystal, Kyle's cohost. The two can be compared in the following way: Krystal emphasizes objectivity and pragmatism, whereas Kyle emphasizes ideology, ideological consistency, order and principle. Classic difference between socio Te and Ti. It also wouldn't make much sense for a supposed LIE to embrace and simp for Bernie Sanders (LII) as much as he did when the two are in conflicting quadras. Others have mentioned his liking for Noam Chomsky (also LII) and this point becomes even stronger. It's all a matter of ideology.

Biografia

Kyle Kulinski (born January 31, 1988) is an American talk radio host, most well-known as the voice of The Kyle Kulinski show on the Secular Talk Radio Network.

Internet celebridade semelhante a Kyle Kulinski (Secular Talk)

google-playapple-store