Anais Watterson mbtiパーソナリティタイプ
個性
"Anais Wattersonはどのような性格タイプですか？ Anais Wattersonは、INTJ in MBTI、5w4 - sp/sx - 514 in Enneagram、RCOEI in Big 5、ILI in socionics のパーソナリティタイプです。"
In The Detective we can clearly see her Dominant Ni, Auxiliary Te, and Inferior Se at play, with even notes of Tertiary Fi and shadow functions. She immediately comes to the conclusion that Gumball was at fault for losing Daisy and THEN uses Te to support that conclusion after she's already came to it (proving her Te is auxiliary and not dominant). She has severe confirmation bias in this episode (Ni-Fi) but still wants to find objective evidence she's right instead of *just* going off her assumption because she "needs more proof" (Te) but then she proceeds to ignore external evidence of Darwin's involvement in favor of zeroing in on Gumball (inferior Se) for basically no other reason than that was the conclusion she immediately jumped to and got tunnel vision for (Ni) and she likes Darwin better (Fi), completely disregarding the fact that Darwin had previously *became a dictator* (Te grip moment lmao) repeating her past mistake of going too easy on him (low Si). She blatantly acknowledges that the evidence points to Darwin (Te) and then dismisses it (Inferior Se) because it doesn't confirm her Ni belief, so therefore it must not count. She's very clearly prioritizing her Ni one singular outcome which is in part clearly fueled by her own personal feelings towards each of her brothers, Fi. She personally likes Darwin better than Gumball so therefore that must mean Gumball is the villain here. She then believes everything Darwin tells her despite him displaying bodily signs of deception. She's normally good at detecting deception towards her. Why is now any different? Because she already decided beforehand she believed him (Ni). She then scolds herself in a very Ti critic manner, asking how she could have "missed so much" with her Se Inferior. She's genuinely mad at herself for having disregarded her Te-Se objectivity for her Ni confirmation bias infinitely more than she is at Darwin. She's mad at him too but a lot more mad at herself and thinks this is her fault for "missing stuff". actually goes comparatively easy on him when she finds out that he was the one who planned to destroy the evidence, not Gumball. She talks about how "redemption is a funny thing", wants to offer him a plea deal *before* resorting to threatening him, genuinely empathizes with him ("I know what he tried to make you do"), and looks somewhat sympathetic when he's upset about having lost Daisy for good (even though she's still angry). This whole episode (and in the show in general) Anais ping-pongs between wanting objective factual concrete evidence for her Ni assumptions (Te) and heavy usage of Fi. This ability to just switch between Fi and Te at a moments notice with no problems is almost exclusively seen in ExFPs and IxTJs. And she's definitely the latter. IxxJs have famously bad confirmation bias. They cherry pick information that confirms their beliefs and fit information that doesn't into their belief somehow. Evidence is pointing to Darwin? Well obviously thats because he's Gumball's accomplice and he tried to force him into behaving this way. (And I already know exactly what the replies are gonna be: "anyone can have confirmation bias". Yeah, no ****. Anyone CAN have confirmation bias. Doesn't negate the fact that its associated with IxxJs.). Ni > Si because this isn't based on her personal experiences. She actually does a pretty decent job of keeping her personal experiences out of it. She just obsesses over one idea and one outcome. Not even just in this episode, as a general rule. So, in conclusion we know she's on the Ni-Se axis, we know she's a Te-Fi user, and we know she's Pe Inferior. The only option is INTJ.
バイオグラフィー
個性 correlate
Gumball Watterson
Richard Watterson
Darwin Watterson
(Doctor) Nicole Watterson
Carrie Krueger
Alan Keane
Mr. Steve Small
Penny Fitzgerald
