The MBTI is pseudoscience. MBTI 성격 유형
인격
"The MBTI is pseudoscience.은 어떤 성격 유형입니까? The MBTI is pseudoscience.은 mbti의 ESTJ 성격 유형입니다. enneagram의 3w2 - so/sp - 368, big 5의 RCOEI, socionics의 LSE입니다."
We're all in agreement that MBTI is considered pseudoscience, but it still gets some patterns right. Now then, considering that MBTI isn't total garbage and that obviously there are different mental archetypes from person to person... Then, why does the system still follow, in such a dogmatic way, the theories of a single guy from the 19th century instead of evolving with modern neuroscience to refine itself? I think the biggest problem with MBTI is that it’s a good idea that refused to evolve. Instead of adapting the concepts of cognitive functions, It just parrots what Jung said more than 100 years ago without any real evidence. As of now, It will keep being a pseudoscience
