Sexual One MBTI 성격 유형
인격
"Sexual One은 어떤 성격 유형입니까? Sexual One은 mbti의 ESTJ 성격 유형입니다. enneagram의 1w2 - sx/so - 136, big 5의 SLOEN, socionics의 LSE입니다."
Debunking D.As earlier innacurate LSI SX1 post (since the LSI votes are rising again for whatever reason) 1.) Here he claimed Ti ignoring is a contradiction to the SX1 (because apparently rigidity and ideology = Ti, duh), when in reality Ti ignoring fits SX1 very well due to the fact that Ti ignoring makes LSE more focused on applying facts to correct the reality around them, instead of trying to analyze data and get things to make sense to them from a logical standpoint. What D.A still fails to realize is that SX1 and E1 in general is not a type thats focused on logical accuracy, that’d be E6. And their ideals of how things should be dont come from within themselves either, rather E1 gets their ideas through external facts and socially accepted standards (Te base). They take the facts (that are commonly accepted by society) and use them to perfect everything around them by whatever the facts say. He himself admitted that Te base is focused on the workflow of actions “In Socionics, Te is the logic of actions, or "business logic." It's anti-ideological, and instead examines a situation and determines what is the most logical, effective course of action based on what's happening right now.” -This is exactly how the SX1 is with their perfectionism. Not to mention that Socio Ti has nothing to do with ideology either, nor are Te bases “flexible” (Ive already shown a LSE description that confirms how they’re the most law and order type earlier on this same page) 2.) Here he claimed that Si ego is a contradiction to E1, and used weird logic to justify this, like Si ego would be SP9 in its base function, which is just off as types like ILE have Ti ego and Ti base would be SO6. Going by his logic, then ILE wouldn’t be able to be E7 because of Ti ego, because “E7 is loose and Ti creative is rigid” In other words, this was weird logic and nothing else He also falsely claimed that the demonstrative function doesn’t matter to someone. Which is just wrong. The demonstrative function is the second strongest function (its 4D) , second easiest to use, and second most used function. In other words, LSEs are much better at Se than LSIs are, and they have more awareness of how Se works (as LSEs Se is 4D compared to LSIs 3D) Demonstrative function descriptions from classical socionics “A means to achieve goals by changing the real situation, influencing the vitality of others.” “On the [4/2] the individual tries to shine, to necessarily earn praise, to attract attention with their purely physical endurance. […] After all, this is the half-phase where the individual’s vital energy is used.” “Every person gladly demonstrates the second element of their Id block. For the LSE [demonstrative Se] this is quality of objects” Demonstrative descriptions from wikisocion “A person will often have just as sophisticated an understanding of this function as his or her leading function. Unlike the ignoring function it plays a major part in a person’s worldview” “The demonstrative function is easiest function to use (after the base function) yet often occurs sporadically. When one experiences a problem regarding this function, one must correct it as it does play a vital part in a person’s worldview.” LSE Se demonstrative (By Vera Stratievskaya) “Constantly and everywhere, for reason and without any apparent reason, the ESTj expresses a willingness to give a strong-willed rebuff to anyone who encroaches on him in the smallest manner. The LSE constantly demonstrates his ability, capability, and willingness to stand up for himself.** Its also worth noting that he conveniently left out the fact that LSI has Si in the demonstrative position, and as a result, LSIs are alot better at using Si than LSEs are and use it way more frequently. This is also why he once used ESIs Si demonstrative to try to argue against ESI SX4, and LIIs Ni demonstrative to argue against LII SO6. 4.) I dont know how, but it seems he somehow got to the conclusion (thats false) that LSI is better at expressing their emotions than LSE is, which is very inaccurate as Fe is LSIs weakest function (even weaker than their Ne), LSIs do seek Fe, but this has more to do with duality. LSIs are terrible at expressing their emotions and reading the emotions of others, its why their Fe is 1D and in the suggestive function. LSEs are a lot better at Fe than LSIs are for the simple fact that their Fe is 2D and in the role position, and the role function is alot easier to use than the suggestive. In other words, LSEs are alot better at expressing their emotions than LSIs are. 4.) Quadra Values. Here he tried to downplay LSEs and portray them as if their SLIs, just because of them being in the Delta Quadra, which is laughable because Quadra values dont even exist, they were never apart of the original Socionics model, and some modern Socionics schools dropped them altogether today. The Quadras in classical Socionics are about IME groupings and have no values attached to them.
전기
The Sexual One is the only Type 1 subtype that feels more comfortable with anger. They tend to express the passion of anger more than the other subtypes, even though they also sometimes control it. They are more critical of others than they are of themselves, although they are still self-critical. They claim connection to a higher moral authority and are more often reformers than perfectionists. They are zealous when advocating for what they see as right, for what needs to be fixed, and for their right to get what they want. SX1 Descriptions: https://wiki.personality-database.com/books/enneagram/page/sexual-1-in-detail
