Ivar, the Boneless typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
Although I plan to explain ENTJ, 3w2, and 387 for Ivar, enjoy the VLFE post and this appetizer until then. 𝘼𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙏𝙚 𝙫𝙨 𝙎𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙢 𝙖𝙣𝙙 2𝙁 𝙫𝙨 3𝙁, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙝𝙤𝙢𝙚. Se dom in Jung's words below: "The lover of tangible reality", "No desire to dominate", "Little tendency of commanding purpose", "His lively capacity for enjoyment makes him very good company", "Main pursuit is the intensification of sensations", "His easy-going attitude accepts indiscriminately everything that happens", and lastly, "Although this does not by any means imply an absolute lawlessness and lack of restraint, it nevertheless deprives him of the essential restraining power of judgment". This doesn't paint the reality of Ivar's dominant preference, does it? This paints the reality of Uhtred (The Last Kingdom), an Se dom with the lofty goal of taking back his inheritance of Bebbanburg yet judgements never overrode his Se preference. Te dom in Jung's words below: "His aim is to be ideal", "Good and evil measured, and beauty and ugliness determined", "All is right that corresponds with this; all is wrong that contradicts it. Everything else is accidental", "Becomes a world-law, must be achieved at all times", "His entourage must also obey since the man who refuses to obey is wrong, he is resisting the world-law, and is, therefore, unreasonable, immoral", "This is not from any great love for his neighbour, but from a higher standpoint of justice and truth", "'One should' or 'one must' judgements", "A ventilator of public wrongs [vengeance]", "Unfavourable results of their tyranny", "Usually it is the nearest relatives who have to taste the most disagreeable results of an extraverted formula", "Manipulative [selfish gains, unhealthy]", and lastly, "End justifieth the means". After you have read both, you can picture Ivar's preferences and actions throughout the series easier in the (Te) second set of sentences rather than the (Se) first set of sentences. What some also view as his E8 "rebellious nature" (should you use this excuse) is nothing more than him being Te dom (he is indeed a strong 8 fix though). Makes little sense to overly justify ESXP through E8 when neither represents his true self. Additionally, Ivar's actor detailed that Ivar does what he should, what he thinks is right. It is in his pagan views. He classified Ivar as an anti-hero rather than a villain or anti-villain. Aside from aggression issues, he stated Ivar isn't a man who throws himself into action, it isn't his preference. He is insecure about his physics and inserts himself as over-compensation, to keep his image as "Viking" intact even as a cripple. He thinks before he does and prefers to observe than action, maintaining his own security. It was in his interviews. Explanation below: Ivar's aim to be the ideal can be seen in him attempting to fulfill expectations such as eclipsing Ragnar's fame, being an example of a true Viking, being a man / useful to his society, and going by his Old Norse ways from start to finish. There are a few segments in the show where you get to see Ivar speak of these things such as his conversation with Margrethe where he admitted to the hard expectations of being Ragnar's son + expectations of what a man entails. When Ivar had a conversation with Aslaug, his mother, before he left for England, he told her he desired to be useful, to be a man, rather than a lifetime of pity and contributing to nothing. When he returned to Kattegat after allying with the Rus, he reluctantly admitted that the crown does make one mad due to its power, to King Harald. Ivar often used his intelligence, stating the mind was greater than the sword, to cover up his deficiency in the physical expectations of being a man and a real Viking, with segments showing his insecurity of not being in the forefront of fights as every typical Viking, over-compensating his image with aggressive 3F acts at times. Additionally, Ivar has an Old Norse world view and everything outside that view is as it stated - wrong, untruthful, immoral, or evil. Those around Ivar must also follow his world view and if they should contradict that, they must be dealt with (primarily seen in the Mad King arc where he was radical about it). Ivar allowing Margrethe to live due to her bringing up his Old Norse view was not a love or care for her but purely due to his standard. Hvitserk was the nearest relative that, yes, had to endure Ivar's tyranny the most when Ivar briefly turned Kattegat into a dictatorship regime where he was their God, and all law would be delegated to him. Te dom > Fe dom > Se dom in Jungian for Ivar (I did not describe Fe dom here but as there are similarities to Te dom and it is an extraverted judging function, it goes above Se dom as Ivar is categorized by his judging preference rather than his perceiving preference).
