Herta typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
(1/4) ⌀ Herta is sexual 6 Judging by the new plot, in the character of Herta there are elements of a difficult transfer of betrayal and difficulty with a negative opinion in her direction. I used to think that one obviously aggressive attitude towards others as a defence mechanism would not be enough for the sake of individual arguments in favor of sx6... Still, I don’t see a 5 in her. Avarice 5 makes her prone to conflict avoidance and rationalization, because this enneagram does not want to show and feel bright emotions for fear of disappearing, Herta has an initially attacking behaviour and general scepticism as the original defence mechanism against aggression in your side. And her eidolons like "No One Can Betray Me", "Cuss Big or Cuss Nothing", "Hit Where It Hurts", "Kick You When You're Down" demonstrate it. Herta deliberately protected her portraits from vandalism with encryption and uses her dolls to move and work in what may seem like a paranoid need for protection and confrontation. Also despite stereotyping due to intellectualization 5, enneagram 6 is also highly rationalistic and cerebral type, and an important part of character 6 is the primary search for Truth, which can manifest itself in her search for information about the Objective Universe and the Aeons. So this motivation can be confused with the accumulation of knowledge for the sake of protection in enneatype 5. Further, I use the characteristics of the enneatype sx6 to justify my point of view. Doubtful and Insecure Doubting is the preferred entertainment of this subtype. “To be or not to be” is Hamlet's dilemma, but E6 is not limited to doubting only on the existential plane. His doubtful thought expands everywhere: “To go or not to go? To speak or not to speak? To eat or not to eat? Now or later? Here or there?” And while waiting for an illumination that allows you to make the choice without running the risk of making mistakes, the person to whom you should speak is gone, the spaghetti is gone, and space and time take their course autonomously. The interesting thing is that individuals of this character believe in their doubts. They think that to doubt is necessary to carry out a fair and effective action. Doubting is the fearful person's way of stopping time, with the illusion that “inaction will limit the damage.” Which? That's secondary: the damage is anywhere. The sexual subtype does not tolerate much doubt, does not want to be in contact with the anxiety, frustration, and helplessness that come from inaction. So, when he can't take it anymore, he impulsively makes a decision: go, speak, risk your life (trying not to lose control). He remains with the doubt but at least discharges the accumulated tension. And then, like a good schizoid, he adopts an absolute position and represses one of the polarities of doubt; he assumes an aggressive and arrogant attitude to convince himself and others that this decision is the only thing that can be done. Doubtful thinking is connected to insecurity, which he tries to hide for fear that if they see it, they will take advantage of him. Braggart He likes to look triumphant. It is a victory over oneself: over that “oneself” that, deep down, knows that it is injured in its integrity. And under the pressure of needing a constant demonstration or reliable proof of what he is capable of; that is, that he is able to get out without harm, without pain, whether physical or emotional. It is not enough for him to prove something to himself introspectively, in silence. For it to acquire validity, for it to be real to itself, the sexual E6 needs to show it, say it out loud, explain the battle… This results in bragging, that fearless attitude that hides the inner insecurity for which you need to explain yourself over and over again, checking that there is no criticism, that there is acceptance. And there is also, deep down, a need to justify oneself. Of course, he only needs to share it with those closest to him, with those who will not question him, who will accept his bravado and agree with him, which will validate him and allow him to feel moral superiority. ⌀ In a way, Herta's intelligence is being used as a validation tool. She constantly insults other people's mental development and demonstrates her genius in order not to let other people convince her otherwise.
Biografia
Member 83 of the Genius Society, the real master of the Space Station. An incredibly intelligent yet unsympathetic scientist.
