1. Ludzie i postacie
  2. Archetypy
  3. Most likely to

Be bad at arguing typ osobowości MBTI

Be bad at arguing typ osobowości MBTI image

Osobowość

"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."

It’s easy to win an argument. All you need to do is make a mental list of your points, keep calm, and accept defeat if it comes. Because the point of arguing isn’t winning, it’s to reach the truth, or at least a viewpoint that makes the most logical sense. More people need to accept that they’re wrong or mistaken, in which case the argument can end with both on good terms, but if they don’t, which is the more likely outcome, this can lead one side run out of points because they’re just wrong. In my opinion, one becomes bad at arguing once they become more focused on winning than actually reaching the truth, as this can lead to the situation I described above. If one loses an argument, it should be because the original statement/point was plain incorrect. But because of factors like pride and such, people with initially good, right arguments will lose.

Biografia

google-playapple-store