Młynar typ osobowości MBTI
Osobowość
"Jaki typ osobowości jest {profilename}? {profilename} jest typem osobowości {mbti} w mbti, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} w enneagram, {big5} w Big 5, {sociionics} in Socionics."
[Reevaluated] I find that Młynar is severely underdeveloped in terms of personality. His own functions are contradictory and inconsistent. Examples: In Si, he pays attention to the minutiae, values the familiar and the tried and true. But he doesn't prioritize subjective sensory comfort. In Ni, he has an inconsistent relationship with these function. He's perceptive to underlying meanings and abstract associations but rejects Ni values, such as abstract idealism and its' meaning. In Se, he's grounded in reality and the here and now. He's also situationally adaptive but he doesn't seek sensory stimuli. In Te, he prioritizes objective decision-making and is results-oriented but doesn't want quick and efficient resolution to problems. I also believe that you can use functions outside your stack, so this isn't an argument about whether he's this or that function. Still, I leaned towards ISTJ because his use of Si, Te and Fi is still somewhat functional. I'm trying hard to see the Ni angle, he does use it but he doesn't even find it reliable. Dominant Si Młynar focuses on tangible details, but his motive's neither noble nor sloppy—it’s habitual precision. He keeps up “an unhelpful habit” of meticulously reading newspapers, implying his compulsion to track concrete events, even though he acknowledges it’s less useful than lived experience. When waiting for enemies in Area 0, he calmly sat reading a paper instead of pacing or brooding, fixating on the physicality of a mundane detail while violence surrounded him. His corporate life is also obsession with details: he worked ten years without taking a single leave, a mechanical attention to daily minutiae over higher ideals. Even in duels, he notices the exact state of Margaret’s improved technique, acknowledging the specifics of her swordplay while chastising her broader choices. These patterns are detail orientation not as inspiration but as a rigidly applied practice. He embodies Si's clinging to the familiar, sticking to established patterns. In his dialogue he insists on always using “the same sword” versus adopting novelty. His whole career path is reliance on what’s familiar: once a knight-errant, he abandoned that and resigned himself to the drudgery of being a corporate functionary, a preference for the “tried and true” over innovation. In Archive File 1, his sword style stems from traditional Nearl family training practices, which he repeats faithfully instead of experimenting. Even when Margaret kept her title after the spectacle of the Major, he sneered at her “cheap commercial performances” because they strayed from the Nearl’s tried traditions. However, he doesn't express concrete preferences about comfort or material tangibles. Across dialogue and stories, his concerns focus on honor, reputation, or institutional decay, not his own physical satisfaction. For instance, in Trust Increase 1, when he recalls living among refugees, he notes their most tangible comfort's merely “climbing out of their tent” before dying, but he doesn’t project his own needs. In Area 0, while others fought, he sat on a bench and read his paper, but this wasn’t about comfort—just about waiting without acknowledgment of personal preference. Even his Operator File focuses on wilderness endurance and knightly practices, not luxury or comfort. The narrative stresses his aloofness and cynicism, but nowhere indicates he tailors actions to his own comfort. His habits are about resignation, not tangible comfort. Auxiliary Te Młynar uses objective decision-making, though in a cold, detached way. He tells Rhodes Island he can't advise them on Kazimierz affairs, claiming he's just “an unambitious nobody” despite a decade in the tower. That refusal is an ability to separate personal feeling from pragmatic assessment. Also, when discouraging Maria’s involvement in the Major, he insists she “must always be responsible for her own actions” versus relying on sentiment. His duel with Margaret's framed as “teaching her a lesson” versus indulging familial affection. Even when confronted with Infected suffering, he dismisses it as “their matter” and claims no interest. He strips away emotion and evaluates situations by practical consequences. He does act with a results-oriented mindset, even if he conceals it. He secretly hires Toland to protect Maria and Margaret—an indirect but concrete step to ensure survival results. He worked ten years straight without leave for his corporate superiors, a dogged focus on fulfilling imposed goals, no matter how soulless. His choice to resign by mail and immediately return to Kazimierz was an efficient, goal-driven move, meaning he prioritizes final outcomes over ceremony. Even in his duel with Margaret, after defeat, he acknowledges her improved skills and cautions her against dragging others into her cause—goal-focused advice, not emotion-driven. 👇
