David Suchet MBTI性格类型
性格
"David Suchet是什么人格？ David Suchet是MBTI中的INFJ人格类型，九型中的1w2 - sp/so - 125，五大类型中的，Socionics中类型。"
His approach to character portrayal (method acting) involves unearthing the meaning & significance behind his character's emotions, psyche, history, life & existence. A few ways to go about this.. but Suchet concentrates his focus on isolating the hidden integral source embedded in the soul of his characters & their life experiences, which ultimately shapes the characters' paradigms and, by extension, their outward expression. He gathers this information through Ni-Fe, then pieces it into an intricate, subjective logical framework that ultimately brings clarity to how all of the root elements in his character's model "click". (Ti) His thought process is highly convergent, synthesizing collected bodies of information observed in people's expression into a principally significant item.. i.e., a clear portrait of the nucleus of the character's being. There are many approaches to method acting, but Suchet's principally relies on Ni-Fe-Ti. The IxTJ votes here warrant an explanation.. there is zero Fi-Te in Suchet. A few quotes from various interviews: - "The reason I became an actor was to serve my writers. It had nothing to do with me. I just wanted to serve the writer, and give them a voice for their character. That's what gives me a purpose." - "I'm not interested in me, in any way at all. Even in life, or as a performer. I don't really count, it's what I do.. in how I serve my writer in the character that I'm playing." As expressed in nearly all of his interviews, Suchet's achieved purpose in acting is using his talent to help & serve creators. He is completely detached from himself & his inner world (refusing to acknowledge it, in fact) & fixated entirely on understanding the motivations of the people who write the characters he portrays so that he can forge a positive contribution to their work's materialization in the world. Additional quote (when asked why the Book of Romans converted him to Christianity): - "It's to do with how you relate to people. That's the worldview. And the worldview that I read was very simple, and it has to do with one word, which is 'love'. And generosity & kindness. It had nothing to do with rules and regulations or anything like that. I would have run a mile from all that. But it had to do with love, and it had to do with people, and it had to do with how to relate in that way. And that's what converted me." Suchet, on many accounts, talks extensively about the priority he places on relating to people, calling this his "worldview" & his reason for living. In his religious conversion, he was ultimately reigned in by the community factor, while structural aspects (rules/regulations) were a forceful repellent. (Fe>Te) He values community contribution, & harbors a repeatedly-expressed disdain & loathing for introspection of self. Although not stated explicitly by Suchet, his other comments strongly suggest that any understanding he may have of himself is formed through his understanding of other people.. pointing distinctly to Fe > Fi. Suchet's Fe is also evident in his speech & behavior when socially engaging people. His interactions are marked by constant gesturing (through expression, tone, & content of speech) in an accommodating manner that seeks to positively influence the social atmosphere and make people feel included & heard. Opportunities to broaden questions in order to involve other people are never missed. Overall, a very, very socially aware person. I think the IxTJ votes may be coming from people accrediting his perfectionism & diligence to Te & Si. Note: Diligence ≠ Te. And perfectionism ≠ Si. Cognitively speaking, there are many combinations of functions that can manufacture perfectionistic behavior, as there are many different forms & varieties of what can be called "perfectionism".. and Te is NOT required to have diligent attributes. In Suchet's case, his diligence is actually a linear byproduct of his perfectionism, & his perfectionism owes itself primarily to his Enneagram rather than specific cognitive functions. Si is not present in Suchet.. at all. He does not perceive present sensory data through a filter of subjective imagery generated from past-perceived experiences. (Si) He perceives sensory information with the objective of isolating the fundamental theme buried within, from which all superficial expression derives, and uses this to model his "ideal". (Ni) His "perfectionism" is actually just extreme "idealism". Suchet's diligence & dedication to accuracy emerge as a result of this idealism, & also his consideration for the writer of the portrayed character & how people relate to the writer through his portrayal. No Te, no Si. I would also be very intrigued to hear an explanation for the ENFJ vote.. particularly, an argument for tertiary Se>Ti. I see FAR more Ti in Suchet's thought process & extensive framework building than any cognitive faculties that might be to the credit of Se. And the dom-Ni is frankly impossible to ignore.
背景
David Courtney Suchet, CBE (/ˈsuːʃeɪ/ SOO-shay; born 2 May 1946) is an English actor, known for his work on British stage and television. He played Edward Teller in the TV serial Oppenheimer (1980) and received the RTS and BPG awards for his performance as Augustus Melmotte in the British serial The Way We Live Now (2001). International acclaim and recognition followed his performance as Agatha Christie's detective Hercule Poirot in Agatha Christie's Poirot (1989–2013), for which he received a 1991 British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) nomination.
