Harold Finch MBTI性格类型
性格
"Harold Finch是什么人格？ Harold Finch是MBTI中的INTP人格类型，九型中的6w5 - sp/sx - 614，五大类型中的RLOAI，Socionics中LII类型。"
He is always talking about the consequences to the PEOPLE of the world under an immoral AI, not the working systems of society. That is Fe acting, not Fi/Te. Not his own idealizations of how he believes an AI should benefit society (like Greer who has Te-Fi), but how its actions affect people's lives directly. The machine may have Fi-Te axis (tbh I'm not going to try to assign personality to an AI), but that doesn't necessarily mean he does. It learned many things from him, but took in information in its own way. Fi is more likely to want to influence the world with its ideals due to the subjective way it absorbs information ("how does this affect my personal set of rules in an ideal world?"), while Fe is objective in its observation of social ladders, chains, and relationships ("how does this affect the lives of everyone I see?"). He is always adamant about the Machine saving every person, never making exceptions or sacrifices even if it means receiving major setbacks in plans (the one time this happened, he was extremely conflicted and UPSET, focusing much more on the life lost and could not find himself justifying the positive outcome). The Machine had to learn this behavior from Harold to temper its desires to be set free and do whatever it wanted in the beginning stages. Harold wanted the Machine to truly understand the consequences of its actions on real human lives that is not based on the whims of what it arbitrarily believes to be morally correct, especially when it may never have first-hand experience of human suffering and tragedies. Mature INTPs can be very insightful with their Fe when they are both intelligent and emotionally developed in their later years. (Albert Einstein and the atomic bomb comes to mind, although he definitely wasn't perfect in many areas of his life.) Tbh I don't see very good arguments for Te, and Ni no less. Te is about finding what works in the most straightforward way in real life. What can be done to make something work as efficiently as possible with a specific goal in mind? Harold had no personal visions for the machine when he made it outside of the general 'I love tinkering and learning and wanted to honor my dad's memory as well as Nathan in deploying this super AI'. He used his intelligence to create it for the government and mostly cared about safeguarding it so that no one gets to play God with it, not even the Machine itself. That's preventative action, not proactive like high Te. His external decision-making function (Fe) is inferior, so he didn't step in to hire John (and John's predecessors) until AFTER the ferry bombing tragedy happened, where Nathan was also taken. When the consequences of real life that affected the people around him finally hit him, that was exactly when his Fe overtook him so that he'd take in the reins of his creation and not merely hand it over to the government for the justice of the people whose lives were lost or would be lost. The inferior function can become a powerful driver/motivator under extenuating or life-changing circumstances that turn one's head toward what they have been blind or hesitant to see before. His paranoia can easily be attributed to the Ne-Si axis. At least I know mine does. Ne sees many possibilities of threats while Si is vigilant of these threats because it looks for comfort, resisting external changes that negatively affect the status quo or existing balance. If I can't convince you with this, then maybe read Jung's description of Si: "When [an object's] influence does succeed in penetrating into the subject because of its special intensity or because of its complete analogy with the unconscious image, even the normal type will be compelled to act in accordance with the unconscious model. Such action has an illusory character unrelated to objective reality and is extremely disconcerting. It instantly reveals the reality-alienating subjectivity of this type. But when the influence of the object does not break through completely, it is met with well-intentioned neutrality, disclosing little sympathy yet constantly striving to soothe and adjust. The too low is raised a little, the too high is lowered, enthusiasm is damped down, extravagance restrained, and anything out of the ordinary reduced to the right formula-all this in order to keep the influence of the object within the necessary bounds." "Whereas true extraverted intuition is possessed of a singular resourcefulness, a "good nose" for objectively real possibilities, this archaicized intuition [Si] has an amazing flair for all the ambiguous, shadowy, sordid, dangerous possibilities lurking in the background. The real and conscious intentions of the object mean nothing to it; instead, it sniffs out every conceivable archaic motive underlying such an intention." I'd say Ni's vice is more characterized by obsession than paranoia due to its linearity toward a focused vision. 🤷 (cont. in reply)
