1. Menschen und Charaktere
  2. Filme
  3. Shrek (Franchise)

Death MBTI -Persönlichkeitstyp

Persönlichkeit

"Welcher Persönlichkeitstyp ist {profilename}? {profilename} ist ein {MBTI} -Persönlichkeitstyp in MBTI, {enneagram} - {iv} - {tritype} in EnneArgram, {big5} in Big 5, {socionics} in Socionics."

He is definitely INTJ. Let me explain: 1. Ni-Dom. He is a long term strategist. When Puss ran away again and again, Death didn't seem like he was annoyed or upset. Because he know he will have already won, so there is no necessity for worrying. Death as the concept is about inevitable ending with only one way. No one can escape, no one can beat (as he said) or else, very high Ni concept. His main point is to be Death, something inevitable and forceful. I need to remind that he also had been stalking him for a while, maybe deciding about Puss's life and judging his values. It wasn't his immediate choice to kill Puss but a long term conlusion. I think he also didn't mind to stop chasing him if Puss would changed, so he patiently waited. He didn't try to stop Puss to make a wish, because at the end of the day he already won, so it doesn't matter what Puss was doing right now. He is extremely confident about any ending, and his words "We will meet again". Yes, he didn't lose, he just changed his path, not the goal. Yeah, it's not easy to indicate his Te-aux, because we have not seen him interacting with environment outside. But he is really straight up, so yeah, this is Te-aux expression. That's why he cannot be ENTJ, he don't really care about outside world. For this reason he didn't interact with other members of this ride, and he separated Puss from others when fighting (because his principles and doesn't care about outside) 2. Tertiary Fi. He was ruled by his own morality and principles, though no one has any idea about them, but it didn't bother him. He acted by his own intentions. And maybe he somehow justified killing a cat. He made conclusions according to his own feelings about Puss's life, and, I need to add his personal feelings, he is not a cat person (but this wasn't the main reason). Yet It might seems like he was cheating (when tried to kill Puss before his death), but: did he actually cheat on his own philosophy and values? I don't think so, it was look like he was just right doing this, because it all was in line with his settings. He refused to fight Puss until he had his sword, very Fi-ter moment. If his Se was higher than Fi, he would killed Puss without a doubt. Also he couldn't kill Puss at the end because Puss had changed. Killing the morally right cat who appreciate his life wouldn't fit Death's inner morality. So he let him go to live a PROPER life, roughly speaking. So he went to his main chores (being Death, unstoppable and inevitable), that's why he cannot be I×FP, because his feeling are not the main ruler of his existence. And that's why he cannot be ENTJ, with Fi-inf. 3. Inferior Se. Death was disgusted by Puss's frivolous life. (Puss is Se dom). It also might say about his Ni which dictates him that every life should have purpose, harmony, and happiness. ATtention, The most important thing, Death appeared ONLY when Puss had high Se manifestation. Which means Death was after Se expression. So according to Death's philosophy the meaning of life is appreciation, love, respect, and enjoy small things. Almost contrary to Puss's Se appearance. That's why he cannot be ISTP, with Se-aux. Furthermore, that's why his Fi>Se, if he was Se-tert and Fi-inf, he would kill Puss, because he was obviously enjoying the torture and murdering, but morality>>joy. And there is no place for Fe-inf, as ISTP has. To sum up everything above: yes, Death is INTJ. I think he is 1w9.

Biografie

Death is the physical embodiment of death, who takes the form of a white wolf in a black hooded cloak. He is intent on killing the legendary Puss in Boots once and for all, as punishment for carelessly wasting eight of his nine lives.

google-playapple-store