IEE MBTI Personality Type
Personality
What personality type is IEE? IEE is an ENFP personality type in MBTI, 7w6 - sx/so - 749 in Enneagram, SCUAI in Big 5, IEE in Socionics.
𝐈𝐄𝐄 𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐄𝐋𝐅𝐕 [1] 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 I am experiencing some perplexities regarding the compatibility between Leading Ne (focused on mental skills) and 3L. Ti(-) PoLR seems contradictory with 2V more than 2L in this case. It is not analogous to the positively charged Ti(+) PoLR of SEE. This remains a work in progress, but I am fairly certain that a PY type cannot be correlated solely based on structural side correlations reasonment: IEE is Ti PoLR, Ti in socionics equals Logic Aspect in Psychosophy, 3X placements are painful like PoLR, therefore Ti PoLR = 3L without any doubt. No, 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘆 <𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆>, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝘀𝘆𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗟𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰" 𝗜𝗠𝗘𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗰𝘀. We must remember that Intuition (especially Ne) in socionics is what can enhance the Logic Aspect in PY due to what I mentioned earlier regarding mental (and physical) skills. The Logic aspect of PY is strongly correlated with how Ti operates initially, and I completely agree with this, but it is not the only IME. Ne Ego and Ni Ego also influence the placement of PY logic too. Let also point out that producing IMEs are always the most different not only because of charges, but also because of the information metabolized and acquired by the first accepting IME of the block. What receives Ti(-) PoLR is the Se(-) Role infos, while the Ti(+) PoLR receives the Ne(+) Role infos. There's a lot of difference despite the IEE and SEE sharing the Ti PoLR. I'm going to talk about these topics: - The entire block taken in consideration to determine which PY placement is suitable to correlate, not only a single function. IEE is 2L because its SuperEgo has Introverted Thinking only, compared to the SEE SuperEgo which has both Intuition and Logic in the SuperEgo block. - The accepting function being responsible of the consequent information generated by the producing function. - The charges which influence the Ti of IEE, the logic of INDEPENDENCE and passive rebellion of 4V, which is against the responsible and cooperative 2V kind of rebellion. - The refuse of IEE to truly be cooperative like a 2V and the IEE not feeling afraid if considered stupid, but irresponsible and dependent. - The horizontal mindset IEE has which is a passive excape from hierarchies like a 4V which loves to follow the ones the same 4V chooses, not EVERYONE. - The non ambition trait which goes against 1V and partially 3V. (Excluding VELF) - The dualistic relation between IEE and its own body (not totally unbothered like 4F) - Why EVLF (and ELVF maybe) is not a bad take and why it should be taken in consideration despite some incompatibilities. 𝗣𝘀. 𝗜'𝗺 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗜'𝗺 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗩𝗟𝗙 (𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀) 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜'𝗺 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗼𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗼. Sources I used: 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐬 - https://classicsocionics.wordpress.com/blocks-and-functions/ - https://classicsocionics.wordpress.com/augusta-imes/ - https://classicsocionics.wordpress.com/augusta-iee/ - https://augustaproject.wordpress.com/iee-description/ - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CHNHeIW5zOzx-McgCRBfJcGHOfEyHRtPyad7xdmN6nA/edit#heading=h.3itpimuzmn23 𝐏𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐲 - Syntax of Love
Biography
Importance is placed on the interesting and gripping. In these they see potential possibilities and promising trends, both in human society and in the sphere of production, and organize people towards realizing these possibilities.
